Mikkel Schubert
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Hákon Jonsson
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark
Dan Chang
,
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA
Clio Der Sarkissian
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark
Luca Ermini
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark
Aurélien Ginolhac
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark
Anders Albrechtsen
,
Bioinformatics Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Isabelle Dupanloup
,
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
Adrian Foucal
,
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
Bent Petersen
,
Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Lyngby, Denmark
Matteo Fumagalli
,
UCL Genetics Institute, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Maanasa Raghavan
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
Andaine Seguin-Orlando
,
Danish National High-throughput DNA Sequencing Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark
Thorfinn S. Korneliussen
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark
Ahmed Missael Vargas Velazquez
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
Jesper Stenderup
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
Cindi A. Hoover
,
DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA
Carl-Johan Rubin
,
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Ahmed H. Ahmed
,
Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Saleh A. Alquraishi
,
Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Khaled AS. AL-Rasheid
,
Zoology Department, College of Science, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
David E. MacHugh
,
University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Theodore S. Kalbfleisch
,
University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
James N. MacLeod
,
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Edward M. Rubin
,
DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA
Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten
,
Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Lyngby, Denmark
Leif Andersson
,
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Michael Hofreiter
,
Department of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom
Thomas Marques-Bonet
,
ICREA at the Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (Univ Pompeu Fabra/CSIC)., Barcelona, Spain
M Thomas P Gilbert
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark
Rasmus Nielsen
,
Department of Integrative Biology and Statistics, Berkeley, CA
Laurent Excoffier
,
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland
Eske Willerslev
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
Beth Shapiro
,
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA
Ludovic Orlando
,
Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
In contrast with many other domesticated animals, no suitable outgroup exists for examining the genetic basis of the 5.5k year history of horse domestication; the only wild relatives of the domestic horse, the Przewalski's horses, nearly went extinct, and a large portion of their genetic variation was lost. The other members of the genus Equus, on the other hand, split from horses ca. 4-4.5M years ago. We therefore sequenced DNA from two ancient horses excavated in Taymyr, Russia, both of which predated the earliest archeological evidence of horse domestication. By contrasting these to 5 domestic breeds and a Przewalski’s horse, we discovered evidence of genetic structure within Eurasia in the late Pleistocene, and found that the ancient population to which these individuals belonged contributed significantly to the genetic variation of domesticated horses, but not to the Przewalski’s horses. We found that horse domestication was associated with increased levels of inbreeding and an accumulation of deleterious mutations. This is similar to what has been observed for dogs, rice, and tomatoes, which has been termed the ‘cost of domestication’, and is attributed to a relaxation of purifying selection. Using four different computational methods, we furthermore detected evidence for positive selection in a set of 125 genes, including genes involved in a suite of behavioral, neurological and physical characteristics. Our results demonstrates the power of ancient DNA to reveal the complex genetic changes underlying the process of domestication, and offers a model for unraveling the recent history of modern animals, domestic or wild.