W761Host Chromosome Integration Profiles of Marek’s Disease (MD) Virus and Vaccine Strains Differ Between MD Resistant and Susceptible Lines of Chicken
Host Chromosome Integration Profiles of Marek’s Disease (MD) Virus and Vaccine Strains Differ Between MD Resistant and Susceptible Lines of Chicken
Date: Saturday, January 14, 2017
Time: 11:20 AM
Time: 11:20 AM
Room: Sunset - Meeting House
The causative virus for Marek’s Disease (MD) in chickens, a gallid alpha-herpesvirus (MDV), integrates randomly across the host genome and at high frequency into host telomeres in B and T lymphocytes during its highly replicative phase. Ultimately, the virus is found only in an integrated form temporally associated with latency and host cell transformation (Robinson et al. 2010, 2014). MDV-induced tumors appear to undergo a progressive selection process as early-stage tumors demonstrate a heterogeneous integration profile and late-stage tumors have a more homogenous chromosome-integration profile (Robinson et al. 2010; McPherson et al., in prep). These selective forces in tumorigenesis may be influenced by viral integration site, resulting in a suite of common or ‘preferred’ host chromosomes harboring integrated MDV among late-stage tumors. MD vaccines (Rispens, HVT, SB-1) integrate into host chromosomes, but do not establish the latency-associated virus integrated-only phenotype (McPherson et al. 2016). The current study investigated the influence of host genotype on virus- or vaccine-host genome interactions from 1-21 days post infection (dpi)). Inbred lines 63 (MD-resistant) and 72 (MD-susceptible) were challenged with oncogenic Md5 or vaccinated with Rispens or HVT; splenocytes (a mix of B and T cells) were analyzed. The resulting dynamic profiles will be discussed. Interestingly, the Md5-challenged lines were found to differ significantly in the percentage of cells demonstrating specific virus-host phenotypes. The MD-susceptible line indicated a higher percentage of cells exhibiting the latency- and transformation-associated phenotype as compared to the resistant line, and as early as 4 dpi. Supported by USDA-NIFA 2013-67015-21330.
