Abstract: Efficacy of Psychological Treatments for Perinatal Depression and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis (Society for Social Work and Research 31st Annual Conference)

Efficacy of Psychological Treatments for Perinatal Depression and Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Schedule:
Sunday, January 24, 2027
Union Station 14 (Hilton San Francisco Union Square)
* noted as presenting author
Lingli Leng, PhD, Assistant professor, zhejiang university, Hangzhou, China
Wenhan Xiao, Doctoral student, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Xiye He, master student, zhejiang university, hangzhou, China
Teng Wang, master student, zhejiang university, hangzhou, China
Kaida Ning, Researcher, Shenzhen Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China
Background: Perinatal depression and anxiety affect approximately one in five women globally and represent a pressing concern for social workers in maternal and child health, home visiting, and community-based mental health settings. While multiple psychological treatments exist for these conditions, no prior synthesis has simultaneously compared their short- and long-term efficacy using network meta-analytic methods that account for differences in evidence certainty. This study compared the short- and long-term efficacy of psychological treatments for clinically significant perinatal depression and anxiety across randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched from January 1990 to January 2025. Eligible RCTs enrolled pregnant or postpartum women (up to 12 months postpartum) with clinically significant depression or anxiety symptoms. Seventy-eight RCTs involving 11,345 participants were included. Primary outcomes were post-intervention symptom severity; secondary outcomes were symptoms at the longest follow-up (3–12 months). A Bayesian network meta-analysis estimated standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Evidence certainty was evaluated using the CINeMA framework. Between-study heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression examining participant age, country income level, and study risk of bias.

Results: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) demonstrated consistent efficacy for post-intervention perinatal depression (SMD: −0.55, 95% CrI [−0.77, −0.33]; moderate certainty) and anxiety (−0.54, [−1.00, −0.06]; moderate certainty), with sustained effects for depression at follow-up. Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT; −0.65, [−1.09, −0.20]; low certainty) and mindfulness-based intervention (MBI; −2.02, [−2.65, −1.42]; low certainty) also outperformed treatment as usual for short-term depression. Behavioral therapy (BT) showed short-term superiority for anxiety and was the only treatment with a sustained anxiety effect at follow-up. Treatment effects were attenuated in lower-income country settings and in higher risk-of-bias trials, indicating that effect estimates from high-income, methodologically rigorous trials may not generalize uniformly across practice contexts.

Conclusions and Implications: CBT is the most consistently supported psychological treatment for perinatal depression and anxiety and should be prioritized in perinatal mental health services where social workers play a coordinating or direct practice role. IPT, MBI, and BT show preliminary promise but require confirmation through rigorous trials with extended follow-up before being adopted as primary interventions. The moderating role of country income level is a critical caution for international social work: efficacy evidence generated in high-income settings should not be applied without local adaptation and evaluation. Social work educators should incorporate perinatal mental health competencies and familiarity with psychological treatment evidence into clinical training.