Methods: Data were drawn from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being II (NSCAW-II), a nationally representative longitudinal study of children investigated for maltreatment. Analyses focused on children ages 4–6 at baseline (N = 708; 54% male; 43% non-Hispanic White, 32% non-Hispanic Black, 25% Hispanic). Two three-block hierarchical regressions predicted Wave 3 (36 months) Child Behavior Checklist internalizing and externalizing T-scores. Block 1 entered covariates (community environment, child age, poverty level, race/ethnicity, child sex). Block 2 added the corresponding Wave 1 behavioral baseline. Block 3 entered Wave 3 caregiver health via the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Missing data, including 26.7% missingness on Wave 3 caregiver health, were addressed using fully conditional specification multiple imputation (40 datasets) pooled with Rubin’s rules. Formal comparison of PCS and MCS coefficients used the Paternoster test.
Results: For internalizing behavior, the full model explained 25.7% of the variance. Wave 1 internalizing was the strongest predictor (β = .380, p < .001). Caregiver health explained significant incremental variance beyond behavioral stability (ΔR² = .055, p < .001); both PCS (β = −.079, p = .042) and MCS (β = −.218, p < .001) were significant, with MCS significantly stronger than PCS (t = 2.54, p = .011). For externalizing behavior, the full model explained 29.0% of the variance. Wave 1 externalizing was the strongest predictor (β = .455, p < .001). Caregiver health again explained significant incremental variance (ΔR² = .034, p < .001); both PCS (β = −.088, p = .025) and MCS (β = −.158, p < .001) were significant, though their magnitudes did not differ significantly (t = 1.25, p = .212).
Conclusions and Implications: Caregiver mental health emerged as a particularly salient concurrent correlate of child internalizing problems, whereas physical and mental health contributed comparably to externalizing outcomes. Findings suggest that caregiver well-being is an important family-level context for child behavioral functioning in child welfare settings. Practitioners conducting family assessments should attend to caregiver health alongside traditional child-level risk indicators, and integrated services addressing caregiver mental health may yield meaningful benefits for children’s emotional and behavioral functioning. The domain-specific pattern also supports assessing caregiver physical and mental health as distinct dimensions rather than as a unitary construct.
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)