Abstract: Who Sees the Barriers? Community Connectedness and Structural Health Awareness Among Black Women (Society for Social Work and Research 31st Annual Conference)

715P Who Sees the Barriers? Community Connectedness and Structural Health Awareness Among Black Women

Schedule:
Sunday, January 24, 2027
Continental 1-4 (Hilton San Francisco Union Square)
* noted as presenting author
Jenika Scott, Doctoral student, Washington University in Saint Louis
Sheretta Butler-Barnes, PhD, Associate Professor, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO
Background and Purpose: Black women in the United States occupy a distinct social location shaped by the compounding effects of racism, economic marginalization, and limited access to community resources — conditions that disproportionately constrain their health and well-being. Central to the democratic ideal of health as a collective good is understanding how individuals recognize and respond to these structural conditions. Yet research examining the community-level mechanisms through which structural barriers are perceived and internalized among Black women remains limited.

Methods: Data were drawn from the RAND American Life Panel Culture of Health survey, a national probability sample. The analytic sub-sample included 185 Black women identified by self-reported race and gender; survey probability weights were applied throughout. Survey-weighted hierarchical linear regression was conducted in Stata across four steps: (1) demographic controls (age, income, education, insurance status); (2) primary predictors — community health goals, perceived barriers, and social equity orientation; (3) moderators — community connectedness and willingness to act; and (4) six interaction terms (each moderator × each structural predictor). The outcome, Health and Well-being Interdependence, was a 20-item composite scale (α = .892) measuring perceived social and structural influences on health. All continuous variables were mean-centered prior to interaction analysis; variance inflation factors (VIF) assessed multicollinearity at each step.

Results: The full model was statistically significant, explaining 52.2% of variance in health interdependence (R² = .522, F(15, 164) = 6.14, p < .001). Community health goals was the strongest predictor (β = 1.07, p < .001). Perceived barriers were also positively associated with health interdependence (β = .13, p = .026), indicating that Black women who perceived greater structural barriers held stronger collective health beliefs. A significant Community Connectedness × Perceived Barriers interaction emerged (β = −.16, p = .037): the positive association between perceived barriers and health interdependence was significantly stronger among Black women with lower community connectedness — supporting the Structural Vigilance framework. All VIF values were below 2.0; no other interaction effects were statistically significant.

Conclusions and Implications: Findings suggest that community connectedness buffers — and at lower levels, amplifies — the relationship between structural barrier awareness and collective health beliefs among Black women. The structural vigilance observed among less-connected women reflects not a deficit, but an adaptive, informed responsiveness to systemic inequity. For social work practice, these findings caution against interventions that build community ties without simultaneously sustaining critical structural awareness. “Critical connectedness” — fostering both social support and advocacy orientation — is essential for translating vigilance into collective action, a democratic health imperative. Policy efforts should leverage willingness to act as an indicator of community resilience while dismantling the structural conditions that necessitate such vigilance.