Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional survey design conducted between October and December 2025 in a rural area of South Korea. Data were collected via purposive sampling to ensure a diverse representation of older adults. Researchers conducted face-to-face interviews at local senior gathering places and the residences of older adults. The outcome variable, depression, was assessed using the PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), with each item measured on a 4-point Likert scale (range 1 to 4). Exposures were assessed using K-IADL limitations, a 9-item Age-Friendly Communities measure adapted from the WHO Global Age-Friendly Cities Guide (2007), and a 3-item social isolation measure from Statistics Korea. A total of 432 questionnaires were collected; after excluding incomplete responses, 395 cases were included in the final analysis. Multiple linear regression was performed to examine the associations among AFC, social isolation, and depression, incorporating a three-way interaction term with IADL while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics.
Results: A significant three-way interaction was observed among AFC, social isolation, and IADL limitations (β = 0.02, p < 0.001). Stratified analyses revealed that for older adults without IADL limitations, neither AFC nor social isolation was significantly associated with depressive symptoms (p > 0.05). However, for those with at least one IADL limitation, both AFC (β = -0.46, p < 0.001) and social isolation (β = -0.24, p < 0.001) significantly predicted lower levels of depression. Notably, within this vulnerable group, a two-way interaction between AFC and social isolation emerged (β = 0.05, p < 0.01): socially isolated individuals in highly age-friendly communities reported depression levels comparable to those who were not isolated (depression score: 1.23 vs. 1.49). Conversely, in less age-friendly environments, socially isolated individuals reported greater depression levels than those who were not isolated (depression score: 3.23 vs. 1.31).
Implications: This study demonstrates that an age-friendly environment serves as a critical protective factor for older adults facing both functional limitations and social isolation. The findings suggest that AFC can buffer the psychological distress caused by a lack of social support in rural areas. Therefore, enhancing the age-friendliness of rural infrastructures is a vital mental health intervention for those living without adequate caregiving systems.
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)