While health risks from extreme weather, zoonoses, and emerging chemicals increase, many institutions responsible for managing these threats are being dismantled and eroded due to politicization of science. In the U.S., direct cuts to federal health surveillance and response programs have already had clear consequences, while disruptions to the scientific pipeline may have long-term impacts. We highlight scientific, legal, and political strategies used by broader scientific communities to adapt scientific research agendas and community engagement to new guidelines and funding restrictions. Examples include expanding community engagement, pursuing alternative funding sources, and reframing project objectives to remain aligned with both political priorities and original research goals. This session explores viable frameworks for the long-term protection of scientific research through policy change and individual actions.