S004
Centennial: The Anisotropic Earth

Session ID#: 79531

Session Description:
Seismic anisotropy has proven to be a vital constraint in characterizing the dynamic and tectonic processes that have shaped the Earth. Because of the fundamental importance in fully characterizing the amount and orientation of anisotropy as it relates to dynamic processes, numerous seismic analysis techniques have been developed and implemented. Significant work in laboratory experiments has helped illuminate the relationship between deformation, mineralogy, and seismic anisotropy. This session aims to highlight the modern advances made in the application and methodology of the analysis of seismic anisotropy as a tool to better understand our planet by highlighting advancements in seismological techniques from full-waveform modeling, receiver functions, shear wave splitting, surface waves, normal modes, and more. We encourage contributions spanning all depths from the inner core to the crust. We will look back at the field of seismic anisotropy as well as consider the future by emphasizing novel methods and modern advancements.
Index Terms:

7203 Body waves [SEISMOLOGY]
7255 Surface waves and free oscillations [SEISMOLOGY]
7299 General or miscellaneous [SEISMOLOGY]


Primary Convener:  Neala Creasy, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
Conveners:  Caroline Beghein, UCLA - Earth and Space Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, United States, Heather A Ford, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States and Karen M. Fischer, Brown University, Dept. of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Providence, RI, United States
Primary Liaison:  Neala Creasy, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
 
Towards toroidal mode constraints on mantle anisotropy (488379)
Simon Schneider and Arwen Fedora Deuss, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
 
100 years of research in Seismic Anisotropy and prospects for future research (Invited) (488707)
Martha K Savage, Victoria Univ Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
 
The Importance of Mantle Azimuthal Anisotropy for the Coupling of Earth's Normal Modes (490815)
Rûna van Tent and Arwen Fedora Deuss, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
 
Inner core anisotropy - Seismic evidence of slow translation of the iron-nickel inner core (492388)
Daniel Andrew Frost, Berkeley Seismological Lab, Berkeley, CA, United States, Barbara A Romanowicz, Univ California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, Brian C Chandler, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States and Marine Lasbleis, ELSI, Tokyo, Japan
 
Azimuthal anisotropy of the North American upper mantle based on full waveform inversion (494999)
Hejun Zhu1, Jidong Yang2 and Xueyan Li1, (1)University of Texas at Dallas, Department of Geosciences, Richardson, TX, United States, (2)University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States
 
Seismic Azimuthal Anisotropy and Mantle Flow beneath Australia Revealed by Shear Wave Splitting Analyses (499138)
Kailun Ba, Kelly Hong Liu and Stephen S Gao, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Geology and Geophysics Program, Rolla, MO, United States
 
Shear Wave Splitting Analysis in the Eastern Caribbean Plate and its Implications for Mantle Dynamics (501730)
Kevin Gao, University of California Berkeley, Earth and Planetary Science, Berkeley, CA, United States and Kelly Hong Liu, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Geology and Geophysics Program, Rolla, MO, United States
 
Mantle dynamics and deformation patterns beneath Shillong Plateau inferred from Shear wave splitting: The role of major Regional geological structures (501925)
Debasis D Mohanty, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Geosciences, Jorhat, India and Poulommi Mondal, Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Geosciences, Jorhat, India
 
Shear Wave Anisotropy, Mantle Flow, and Structure of the South Cocos Plate, Mexico. (507070)
Luis Vazquez, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, Raul Valenzuela Wong, UNAM National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico and Xyoli Perez-Campos, UNAM, Mexico, Mexico
 
Radial and azimuthal anisotropy of the Australian Plate using full waveform inversion (507286)
Xueyan Li and Hejun Zhu, University of Texas at Dallas, Department of Geosciences, Richardson, TX, United States
 
Shear Wave Splitting with a Dense Array: New Insights on Cascadia from iMUSH (510981)
Caroline M Eakin, Australian National University, Research School of Earth Sciences, Canberra, Australia, Erin Wirth, USGS, Seattle, WA, United States, Abraham Wallace, University of Oklahoma Norman Campus, Norman, United States, Carl W Ulberg, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States, Kenneth C Creager, Univ Washington, Seattle, WA, United States and Geoffrey A Abers, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States
 
Mantle structure and dynamics under the continuous United States inferred from tomographic imaging of radially anisotropic shear velocity. (Invited) (512889)
Robert W Porritt, University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Geophysics, Austin, TX, United States, Thorsten W Becker, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States, Lapo Boschi, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7193, ISTeP, F-75005, Paris, France; CNRS, UMR 7193, ISTeP, F-75005, Paris, France and Ludwig Auer, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
 
Probabilistic, finite-frequency SKS splitting intensity tomography: Practical development and applications (514352)
Puskar Mondal1, Maureen D Long1 and Samuel Borden2, (1)Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States, (2)Yale University, Physics, New Haven, CT, United States
 
The Development of Lithospheric Shear-Strain Anisotropy and Mantle Flow in the Eastern Mediterranean: Evidence from Shear Wave Splitting (515379)
Thomas Merry1, Ian D Bastow1, Laurence Jones1, Rebecca E Bell2, Christopher Steven Ogden1, Rita Kounoudis1, Sylvana Pilidou3 and Iordanis Dimitriadis3, (1)Imperial College London, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, London, United Kingdom, (2)Imperial College London, Department of Earth Science and Engineering, London, SW7, United Kingdom, (3)Geological Survey Department of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
 
The Tale of Two Cratons: Upper Mantle Anisotropy under the Superior and West Australian Cratons (516127)
Xiaoran Chen, Rutgers University New Brunswick, New Brunswick, NJ, United States, Yiran Li, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, United States, Huaiyu Yuan, Macquarie University, CCFS, Sydney, NSW, Australia and Vadim L Levin, Rutgers University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, United States
 
3-D Synthetic Modeling of Anisotropy Effects on SS Precursors: Implications for Flow in the Mantle Transition Zone (517880)
Quancheng Huang, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, United States, Nicholas C Schmerr, University of Maryland College Park, Geology, College Park, MD, United States and Ross Maguire, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
 
The azimuthal seismic anisotropy of Antarctica from ambient noise Rayleigh waves (519930)
Zhengyang Zhou1, Douglas Wiens1, Weisen Shen2, Richard C Aster3 and Andrew Nyblade4, (1)Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States, (2)Stony Brook University, Syosset, United States, (3)Colorado State University, Geosciences Department, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (4)Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, Department of Geosciences, University Park, PA, United States
 
Investigating Seismic Anisotropy below the Central Midwest by Shear Wave Splitting Analysis (520859)
Kathryn Joyce Scholz, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States and Kelly Hong Liu, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Geology and Geophysics Program, Rolla, MO, United States
 
Analysis of Seismic Azimuthal Anisotropy for Lithospheric Structure and Dynamics near the New Madrid Seismic Zone (520943)
Paige Given, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS), Seattle, WA, United States; University of Houston, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Houston, TX, United States and Kelly Hong Liu, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Geology and Geophysics Program, Rolla, MO, United States
 
Modeling of lowermost mantle anisotropy with multiple data types: Case studies beneath Siberia and the Indian Ocean (524175)
Neala Creasy1, Maureen D Long1, Angelo Pisconti2 and Christine Thomas2, (1)Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States, (2)University of Münster, Institute of Geophysics, Münster, Germany
 
Isolating the Anisotropy in Crust and Mantle based on differential Ps – XKS Splitting – A Sequential Approach (526976)
Frederik Link and Georg Rumpker, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
 
Imaging the anisotropic upper mantle structure beneath northeast Asia from Bayesian inversions of ambient noise data (530656)
Sang-Jun Lee, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), Seongryong Kim, Chungnam National University, Department of Geological Sciences, Daejeon, South Korea and Junkee Rhie, Seoul National University, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul, South Korea
 
Crustal Flow and Formation in Iceland from Radial Anisotropy (532400)
Omry Volk1, Robert S White1, Simone Pilia1, Robert George Green2, John Maclennan1 and Nicholas Rawlinson1, (1)University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, (2)Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, Potsdam, Germany
 
Complex mantle deformation in the Big Mantle Wedge of Northwestern Pacific Subduction Zone (533266)
Guo Guangrui, INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, Beijing, China and Juan Li, University of Chinese Adacemy of Sciences, Beijing, China
 
Stratified Crustal Anisotropy beneath the Eastern Tibet from Receiver Function Study (536437)
Shaohua Qi1, Peizhen Zhang2, Qiyuan Liu1, Jiuhui Chen1 and Biao Guo3, (1)Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics, Beijing, China, (2)Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China, (3)Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, China
 
Depth Constraints on Seismic Anisotropy in Iceland from Shear Wave Splitting Measurements (543196)
Conor Andrew Bacon, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Robert S White, Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom and Nicholas Rawlinson, Bullard Laboratories, Cambridge, United Kingdom
 
Seismic Anisotropy in the Greenland Mantle from Shear Wave Splitting (550786)
Erica Nathan1, Anant Hariharan1, Darien Florez2, Hannah Elaine Krueger3, Isabella Gama3, Julia Krogh1, Ningli Zhao3 and Karen M. Fischer4, (1)Brown University, Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, Providence, RI, United States, (2)Brown University, Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Providence, United States, (3)Brown University, Providence, RI, United States, (4)Brown University, Dept. of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Providence, RI, United States
 
Radial and azimuthal anisotropy of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath Alaska inferred from surface waves (556464)
Lili Feng1, Chuanming Liu2 and Michael H Ritzwoller2, (1)University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States, (2)University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Physics, Boulder, CO, United States
 
A relook at slow anomalies in eastern North America using a radially anisotropic shear velocity model (558952)
Aibing Li, University of Houston, EAS, Houston, TX, United States, Zhongmin Tao, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States and Karen M. Fischer, Brown University, Dept. of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Providence, RI, United States
 
Probabilistic Finite Frequency SKS Splitting Intensity Tomography: Applications to South America and the Central Appalachians (562461)
Samuel Borden1, Puskar Mondal2 and Maureen D Long2, (1)Yale University, Physics, New Haven, CT, United States, (2)Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
 
A Leak in the Cauldron: Mantle Flow through an Opening in Subducted Lithosphere beneath Southern Costa Rica. (565969)
Vadim L Levin1, Stephen Elkington2, Lepolt Linkimer3 and Ivonne Arroyo3, (1)Rutgers University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, United States, (2)Rutgers University New Brunswick, New Brunswick, United States, (3)University of Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica
 
Lithospheric azimuthally anisotropic shear-velocity model beneath the North China Craton (574436)
Xuewei Bao, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
 
Crustal and Mantle Anisotropy in the Transitional Region from Oblique Subduction to Oblique Collision along the North American-Caribbean Plate Boundary (579830)
Daniel Possee1, Derek Keir1, Nicholas Harmon1, Catherine Rychert1, Caroline M Eakin2, Frederique Rolandone3, Sylvie D Leroy3, Jordane Corbeau4, Graham William Stuart5, Dominique Boisson6, Roberte Momplaisir6 and Claude Prepetit7, (1)University of Southampton, Ocean and Earth Science, Southampton, United Kingdom, (2)Australian National University, Research School of Earth Sciences, Canberra, Australia, (3)Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, CNRS, ISTeP, Paris, France, (4)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Observatoire Volcanologique et Sismologique de la Martinique, Paris, France, (5)University of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, United Kingdom, (6)UEH Haiti, Port-au-Prince, Haiti, (7)Bureau des Mines et de l’Energie (BME), Port-au-Prince, Haiti
 
The anisotropic seismic signature of plate formation at a slow spreading center (582525)
J Michael Kendall1, Nicholas Harmon2, Catherine Rychert2, David Schlaphorst3, Petros Bogiatzis4, Matthew R Agius4 and Saikiran Tharimena5, (1)University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, United Kingdom, (2)University of Southampton, Ocean and Earth Science, Southampton, United Kingdom, (3)University of Bristol, School of Earth Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom, (4)University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, (5)University Of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
 
Seismic Azimuthal Anisotropy Analysis Beneath the Yellowknife Region, Canada (583223)
Audrey Thompson and Kelly Liu, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Geology and Geophysics Program, Rolla, MO, United States
 
Seismic anisotropy across the Australian continent (591180)
Andrew Birkey and Heather A Ford, University of California Riverside, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Riverside, CA, United States
 
A New Method of Assessing Uncertainty of the Cross-convolution Method of Shear Wave Splitting Measurement (595337)
Derek Schutt1, Jay Breidt2, Ana Corbalan1 and Derek R Witt3, (1)Colorado State University, Geosciences, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (2)Colorado State University, Statistics Department, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (3)SWIIM System, Ltd., Fort Collins, CO, United States
 
Patterns in Crustal Anisotropy and Rock Elasticity from the Chester and Pelham Gneiss Domes (601680)
Sarah J Brownlee1, Kelsey B Hewett2, Breauna Murray2, Michael L Detizio2 and Brittany Watling1, (1)Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States, (2)Wayne State University, Geology, Detroit, MI, United States
 
Deep-crustal Deformation: An Experimental and EBSD-based Study of Amphibole’s Seismic Anisotropy (602123)
Teodora Mitroi, UNAVCO, Inc., Boulder, CO, United States; Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States, Cailey Brown Condit, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States and Matej Pec, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, MA, United States
 
Natural Asymmetric 4 and 6-cycle Seismic Observables from Transverse Isotropic (TI) Media: the Role of the Fifth TI Parameter for Future Seismic Analysis Methods (608039)
David A Okaya, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States and Sarah J Brownlee, Wayne State Univ-Geology, Detroit, MI, United States
 
Crustal shear-wave velocity anisotropy measurements determined from P-wave receiver functions: A possible new tool for determining upper crustal stress orientation (615125)
Kevin McCormack, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States and Mark D Zoback, Stanford Univ, Geophysics, Stanford, CA, United States
 
Transdimensional Bayesian Receiver Function Migration for 3-D TTI Structure (630392)
Scott Burdick, Wayne State University, Geology Department, Detroit, MI, United States and Sarah J Brownlee, Wayne State Univ-Geology, Detroit, MI, United States
See more of: Seismology