A005-0003
Comparing Tropospheric NO2 Retrievals from OMI and TROPOMI during the COVID-19 Lockdowns

Monday, 7 December 2020
Poster
Zachary Fasnacht1, Lok N Lamsal2, Bradford L Fisher3, Wenhan Qin4, Eun-Su Yang4, Alexander P Vasilkov1, Nickolay Anatoly Krotkov5, Joanna Joiner6, David P Haffner1, Bryan N Duncan6, Keith D Evans7, Luke Oman5, Sungyeon Choi3, Sergey V Marchenko4, Joris P Veefkind8 and Henk Eskes8, (1)Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, MD, United States, (2)NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr., Greenbelt, MD, United States, (3)SSAI, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (4)SSAI, Lanham, MD, United States, (5)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (6)NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (7)University of Maryland Baltimore County, Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, Baltimore, MD, United States, (8)Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, 3730, Netherlands
Abstract:
The decreases in transportation use and power production during the COVID-19 lockdowns significantly reduced regional emissions of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) into the atmosphere. Since 2004, the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) UV-VIS spectrometer onboard the NASA EOS Aura satellite has been making measurements of ozone and other trace gases including NO2. In response to COVID-19, the NASA OMI team has developed a monitoring website to track changes in NO2 globally (OMI NO2 Monitoring Website ) using OMI tropospheric NO2 data. We highlight and examine these analyses including timeseries and maps of NO2 during the COVID-19 period in 2020 comparing these to baseline NO2 data from 2015-2019. In 2017, the European Space Agency (ESA) launched the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) instrument on the Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P). TROPOMI provides similar trace gas measurements but at a much higher spatial resolution. We compare NO2 measurements from the OMI and TROPOMI instruments during the COVID-19 period. In addition to the standard ESA NO2 product, we also present our modified TROPOMI NO2 retrievals using a similar algorithm to NASA’s V4 OMI NO2 Standard Product. The main differences between the NASA and ESA TROPOMI NO2 algorithms are in calculation of the Air-Mass Factors (AMF), including the implementation of a dynamic geometry dependent surface reflectivity (GLER), improvements to cloud and snow AMF corrections, and high resolution (0.25o x 0.25o ) a-priori NO2 profiles from NASA’s Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) model replay runs. The decreases in NO2 emissions due to COVID-19 lockdowns provide an excellent opportunity to compare NO2 data from OMI and TROPOMI, highlight the importance of the long-term satellite NO2 record from OMI, and demonstrate the benefit of higher resolution data from TROPOMI.