A132-12
Sector-based inversion of CO emissions during the COVID-19 lockdown

Friday, 11 December 2020: 16:33
Virtual
Benjamin Gaubert1, Simone Tilmes2, Wenfu Tang3, Forrest Lacey3, Louisa K Emmons3, Sara Martinez-Alonso1, Helen Marie Worden1, David P Edwards1, Kevin Raeder4, Jeffrey L Anderson3, Andrew Gettelman3, Kazuyuki Miyazaki5, Thierno Doumbia6, Nellie Elguindi6, Claire Granier7,8, Guy P Brasseur9,10, Avelino F Arellano Jr11 and Nadia Smith12, (1)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Atmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Atmospheric Chemistry, Observations, and Modeling Laboratory, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational & Information Systems Lab, Boulder, CO, United States, (5)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (6)Laboratoire d'Aérologie - Observatoire Midi Pyrénées, Toulouse, France, (7)Laboratoire d'Aerologie, Toulouse, France, (8)University of Colorado/CIRES and NOAA ESRL, Boulder, CO, United States, (9)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, United States, (10)Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany, (11)University of Arizona, Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, Tucson, AZ, United States, (12)Science and Technology Corporation, Boulder, CO, United States
Abstract:
Modelled concentrations of gases and aerosols are the result of a myriad of processes, such as emissions and deposition at the surface, transport and coupled nonlinear chemistry. Detecting a change and quantifying emissions from observed concentrations can be challenging because of biases in the prior set of model inputs and parameters. In addition to the variety of sources, anthropogenic bottom-up emissions are defined for different sectors (industry, transportation, energy, residential) that are difficult to constrain in the inverse-modeling process because of the underdetermined nature of the problem. From this point of view, the COVID-19 lockdown containment provides a real-world experiment where some specific sectors, such as transportation, were almost completely shut down. We use daily sectoral bottom-up emissions from the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) as a baseline to compare with a bottom-up scenario with reduction factors applied to different sectors. We compare the results with top-down estimates of daily reduction factors estimated from the assimilation of TROPOMI (TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument) NO2 and SO2 observations. From this comparison, we perturb emissions sectors to define an ensemble of Community Atmosphere Model with chemistry (CAM-chem) simulations. We then investigate the optimization of sectoral and daily emissions, and the concentration of carbon monoxide (CO) from the assimilation of satellite retrievals. Observations that are assimilated include the Measurements of the Pollution In The Troposphere (MOPITT), Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) and TROPOMI. Finally, we compare the model results with available in-situ measurements and inverted emissions with other bottom-up estimates.