S037
Modeling and Imaging Complex Earthquake Ruptures IV Posters

Friday, 11 December 2020: 04:00-20:59
Poster
Primary Convener:  Théa Ragon, Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
Conveners:  Ryo Okuwaki, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan, Wenyuan Fan, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States and Dara E Goldberg, USGS National Earthquake Information Center Golden, Golden, CO, United States
Primary Liaison:  Théa Ragon, Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
Chairs:  Dara E Goldberg, USGS National Earthquake Information Center Golden, Golden, CO, United States, Théa Ragon, Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, Wenyuan Fan, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States and Ryo Okuwaki, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
OSPA Liaison:  Ryo Okuwaki, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
 
Coseismic Rupture Process of 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Computed Using Regional Back-projection with a 3D Crustal Velocity Model (676264)
Jidong Yang, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States, Hejun Zhu, University of Texas at Dallas, Geosicences, Richardson, United States and David E Lumley, University of Texas at Dallas, Geoscience, Richardson, TX, United States
 
Development of the spatiotemporal trans-dimensional source inversion (764928)
Hisahiko Kubo and Wataru Suzuki, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Tsukuba, Japan
 
Ensemble data assimilation to forecast slow-slip events and earthquakes: a synthetic laboratory test (678526)
Hamed Ali Diab-Montero1, Meng Li2, Ylona van Dinther2 and Femke C Vossepoel1, (1)Delft University of Technology, Geoscience and Engineering, Delft, Netherlands, (2)Utrecht University, Earth Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands
 
Geometry and post-seismic moment release of the faults that ruptured in the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake (714965)
Calum John Chamberlain, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, William Benjamin Frank, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, MA, United States, Federica Lanza, University of Wisconsin Madison, Geoscience, Madison, WI, United States; ETH Zürich, Swiss Seismological Service, Zürich, Switzerland and John Townend, Victoria University Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
 
Imaging of fault-slip distributions using a trans-dimensional geodetic slip inversion approach (690705)
Fumiaki Tomita, JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan, Takeshi Iinuma, JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Research and Development Center for Earthquake and Tsunami, Kanagawa, Japan, Ryoichiro Agata, JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan and Takane Hori, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Research and Development Center for Earthquake and Tsunami, Yokohama, Japan
 
Complex Source Process of the 2020 Caribbean Earthquake along the Oriente Transform Fault (678999)
Tira Tadapansawut, Ryo Okuwaki, Yuji Yagi and Shinji Yamashita, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
 
Insight on rupture dynamics from probabilistic fault models of Chilean large earthquakes (680745)
Emmanuel Caballero, Institut de Physique du Globe Strasbourg, UMR 7516, Université de Strasbourg -CNRS /EOST, Strasbourg Cedex, France, Zacharie Duputel, Université de Strasbourg-CNRS, Institut de Physique du Globe de Strasbourg, UMR-7516, Strasbourg, France; Institut de Physique du Globe Strasbourg, Strasbourg Cedex, France, Hideo Aochi, BRGM, DRP, Orléans, France; Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris, Laboratoire de Géologie - UMR 8538, Paris, France, Harsha Bhat, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France; ENS/CNRS-UMR8538, Laboratoire de Géologie, Paris, France, Nicolas Brantut, University College London, London, United Kingdom and Romain Jolivet, Ecole Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 8538, Laboratoire de Géologie, Paris, France
 
Kinematics of M6.4 and M7.1, 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquakes inferred by the fuzzy inversion method (746660)
Susana Custodio, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, Navid Kheirdast, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Seismology, Tehran, Iran; Ph.D. Student, Tehran, Iran and Anooshiravan Ansari, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Tehran, Iran
 
Moletrack mechanics: Deciphering surface rupture processes from mobile laser scanning and mechanical models (714310)
Johanna Nevitt1, Benjamin A. Brooks1, Todd L Ericksen1, Kenneth Hudnut2 and Craig L Glennie3, (1)U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States, (2)U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States
 
Multi-fault models of the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence highlight complementary slip and fault junction instability (712936)
Zhe Jia, Xin WANG and Zhongwen Zhan, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
Preliminary result of similarity studies between material-science model of dislocation patterns and results of regional active-fault mapping in the central Sulawesi, Indonesia (688769)
Mudrik Rahmawan Daryono, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia, Anggraini Rizkita Puji, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Research Center for Geotechnology, Bandung, Indonesia and Danny Hilman Natawidjaja, Research Center for Geotechnology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia
 
Quantitative comparison between the radiation-corrected EGF and the conventional EGF (689701)
Ritsuya Shibata1, Genki Oikawa1, Naofumi Aso1, Junichi Nakajima1 and Satoshi Ide2, (1)Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan, (2)The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
 
Range of distributed fault rupture - strike-slip and reverse-slip faulting - (772329)
Naoto Inoue, Geo-Research Institute, Osaka, Japan
 
Constraining stochastic slip rupture models with geodetic coupling models: An example application to PTHA in the Cascadia (686784)
David Small, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States and Diego Melgar, University of Oregon, Department of Earth Sciences, Eugene, OR, United States
 
Teleseismic Source Modelling of Strong-to-major Himalayan Earthquakes (676674)
Sankha Subhra Mahanti, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Department of Physics, Kolkata, India, Supriyo Mitra, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Department of Earth Sciences, Kolkata, India and Hiroe Miyake, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
 
The 2017, Mw 4, Ischia Earthquake (South Italy): Source mechanism and rupture model from the inversion of a near-source strong motion record (724319)
Aldo Zollo1, Sahar Nazeri1, Guido M Adinolfi1, Matteo Picozzi2 and Ortensia Amoroso3, (1)The University of Naples Federico II, Department of Physics, Naples, Italy, (2)University of Naples Federico II, Department of Physics, Naples, Italy, (3)University of Salerno Fisciano, Department of Physics "Edoardo Caianiello", Salerno, Italy
 
The complex pull-apart structures associated with large releasing bends on the major strike-slip fault in East Indonesia revealed by the 2018 Palu supershear-earthquake ruptures (Mw 7.5) in central Sulawesi. (679690)
Danny Hilman Natawidjaja, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Bandung, Indonesia, Mudrik Rahmawan Daryono, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), RC Geotechnology, Bandung, Indonesia and Anggraini Rizkita Puji, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Research Center for Geotechnology, Bandung, Indonesia
 
Accounting for uncertain 3D elastic structure in fault slip estimates (690475)
Théa Ragon and Mark Simons, Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
See more of: Seismology