Rethinking Political Violence in Latin America from the Margins

AHA Session 317
Conference on Latin American History 76
Sunday, January 7, 2024: 11:00 AM-12:30 PM
Golden Gate 8 (Hilton Union Square, Lobby)
Chair:
Marian E. Schlotterbeck, University of California, Davis
Papers:
Schoolhouse Politics: Writing and Dissent in Dictatorship
Camilo Trumper, University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Civil Resistance against Dictatorship and the Shining Path in 1990s Peru
Lucía Luna-Victoria Indacochea, Illinois Wesleyan University
The Argentine Right Wing across Three Generations
Craig Johnson, University of California, Berkeley

Session Abstract

In the 1970s, military dictatorships seized power in Chile (1973-1990), Uruguay (1973-1985), Argentina (1976-1983) and in Peru, Maoist insurgents battled an increasingly militarized central government in an armed internal conflict (1980-2000). The political violence of state terror and the democratic transitions in the 1980s and 1990s have generated a rich historiography in recent decades. Rather than train our gaze solely on the perpetrators and victims of human rights abuse, this experimental panel shifts attention to actors on the spatial and generational margins, including the urban poor in the shantytowns of Lima and Santiago, Chilean school children, conservative priests in Argentina, and Jewish groups in the Global North. In engaging the more quotidian dimensions of everyday life in militarized societies, the presentations uncover novel community-driven responses to repression—from student writing as a critical site of dissent, to community spaces of care populated by women and young people, to domestic and transnational religious activism across the political spectrum.

This is a self-consciously expansive panel that seeks to tease out unexpected connections across case studies typically examined in isolation. The experience of Peru’s armed internal conflict is frequently excluded from comparative histories of military rule in the Southern Cone, yet the experiences of grassroots activists in Lima’s shantytowns suggest multiple intersections with the civil society organizing in Pinochet’s Chile. While conservative Catholic priests mentoring right-wing paramilitary organizations in Argentina might seem to have little in common with young people on Chile’s radical left, generational influences played a critical role in the embrace of armed struggle. Similarly, Jewish activists in New York City concerned about human rights abuses in Uruguay might appear far removed from the realities of poor women and children in Lima and Santiago, yet religious solidarities were critical to building emergent human rights networks across South America.

Our panel will feature 6 short presentations from scholars at different career stages followed by a 30-minute Q&A. This experimental session enables a more inclusive dialogue between generations of scholars and across national histories. It also seeks to highlight new or underutilized archives for exploring the transnational and generational dimensions of political activism in Latin America. The extended Q&A will provide space for participants and audience members to draw connections among the papers, as we hope the session will jump-start future collaborations.

See more of: AHA Sessions