| Monday, April 27, 2009: 1:30 PM-5:00 PM | |||
| Room 24/25 (Tampa Convention Center) | |||
| #24 - Consequence Modeling (T1004) | |||
| Consequence modeling has evolved as a result of accident investigations, government regulations, and the maturation of process hazards analysis and quantitative risk assessment. This session will provide examples of where the state-of-the-art currently is. Key Words: Consequence Modeling. | |||
| Chair: | David G. Clark, P.E. | ||
| CoChair: | Brian R. Dunbobbin | ||
| 1:30 PM | Introductory Remarks | ||
| 1:31 PM | 24a | Development of Algorithms for Predicting Ignition Probabilities and Explosion Frequencies Mike Moosemiller | |
| 2:00 PM | 24b | On the Use of Consequence Models for Accident Investigations Prankul Middha, Kees Van Wingerden | |
| 2:30 PM | 24c | A Versatile Approach to Explosion Vent Design for Enclosures Handling Flammable Vapors David Herrmann | |
| 3:00 PM | Break | ||
| 3:30 PM | 24d | Consequence Modeling Lack of Accuracy and Its Effects on Quantitative Risk Analysis Results Mohammed Ayyoubi | |
| 4:00 PM | 24e | Advanced CFD Modeling On Vapor Dispersion and VCE Anna Qiao, Aamund Langelid | |
| 4:30 PM | 24f | NASFM Project on LNG Vapor Dispersion and Source Term Modeling David A. Moore | |
| 5:00 PM | Concluding Remarks | ||
See more of Topical 1: 43rd Loss Prevention Symposium
See more of The 2009 Spring National Meeting