Does the Evolution Toward More Cohesive Gels Reduce Silicone Leakage in Breast Implants?
Methods/Technique: This multicenter retrospective study analyzed 51 periprosthetic capsules collected during implant removal or exchange. Each sample was evaluated for silicone particle count and size, using a validated method. Implants were categorized by gel cohesiveness levels (I, II, III) based on manufacturer catalogs. Particle densities and average sizes were compared among groups for each brand.
Results/Complications
:Among the analyzed capsules, 25 were from Allergan® implants, 21 from Mentor®, and 5 from Motiva®. Capsules from Allergan® and Mentor® implants contained over 2 million particles regardless of gel generation, whereas Motiva® implants contained approximately 100,000 particles.
For Allergan® implants, Cohesiveness I had 30 particles/mm³ (mean size: 32.37 μm), Cohesiveness II: 74 particles/mm³ (mean size: 32.58 μm), and Cohesiveness III: 43 particles/mm³ (mean size: 42.94 μm). Mentor® implants with Cohesiveness I had 131 particles/mm³ (mean size: 25.05 μm) and Cohesiveness II: 27 particles/mm³ (mean size: 25.98 μm). For Motiva® implants, Cohesiveness I had 1 particle/mm³ (mean size: 35.8 μm) and Cohesiveness II: 5 particles/mm³ (mean size: 21.54 μm).
Conclusion: Gel cohesiveness does not uniformly affect silicone leakage across implant brands. In Allergan® implants, leaks were influenced more by Biocell texture than by gel cohesiveness. Higher gel cohesiveness did not reduce leakage in Allergan® and Motiva® implants, whereas Mentor® implants showed a reduction. Motiva® implants exhibited lower silicone leakage overall, unrelated to gel generation used.
