Drawing on data from a mixed-methods evaluation, including administrative and institutional records from a sample of 925 students (CFRR: n = 321; short-term assistance: n = 604), we use multivariate event-history and longitudinal analyses to examine differences in college enrollment over time between groups. This approach allows for a dynamic assessment of persistence, capturing not only whether students remain enrolled, but how long they sustain enrollment following intervention.
Findings indicate that 56% of CFRR participants remained continuously enrolled or graduated, compared to 47% of students receiving short-term assistance, a statistically significant difference. In adjusted models, CFRR participation was associated with higher odds of persistence (OR = 1.56, p < .01). Event-history models further demonstrate that while both groups exhibit similar short-term retention, CFRR participants are significantly less likely to stop out over time, particularly in the year following assistance, suggesting a longer-term stabilizing effect. Qualitative findings suggest that these effects are driven by reduced housing-related stress and increased capacity to focus on academic work, with many students reporting they would not have remained enrolled without the program.
These findings suggest that sustained, housing-focused interventions may play a critical role in supporting educational continuity among housing-insecure students, beyond what short-term assistance alone can achieve. As higher education systems expand basic needs initiatives, investments in longer-term housing stability may represent a key strategy for improving student retention and advancing educational equity.
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)