Three Decades of Hematoma Prevention in Plastic Surgery: 44,133 Consecutive Cases Leading to an Evidence-Based Protocol

Tal Brown, BS, Rachel Rohrich, B.S., Stav Brown, MD and Rod Rohrich, MD, Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute, Dallas, TX
Goals/Purpose: Hematoma prevention in outpatient plastic surgery is crucial for enhancing patient safety and surgical outcomes. With the rise in outpatient plastic surgery, implementing a targeted hematoma prevention protocol is essential. This study evaluates the impact of a 5-step Hematoma Prevention Protocol on hematoma rates over three decades of outpatient cosmetic procedures.

Methods/Technique: All cases were performed by board-certified plastic surgeons at an accredited outpatient facility between 1995 and 2024. Patient demographics, procedural data, and hematoma rates were recorded. Hematoma rates were compared before and after implementing a 5-Step Hematoma Prevention Protocol consisting of 1) thorough preoperative patient optimization, 2) normotensive anesthesia, and perioperative blood pressure management, 3) Intraoperative meticulous hemostasis, 4) Intraoperative Tranexamic Acid (TXA) administration, and 5) postoperative drain placement. TXA was utilized in facelifts and breast procedures, but not in abdominoplasties. Additionally, each protocol component was graded per the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' Evidence Rating and Grading Scales.

Results/Complications: A total of 44,133 consecutive cases were analyzed, with an overall hematoma rate of 0.46% (n=203). Hematoma rates were highest in abdominoplasty (0.8%, n=35), followed by breast procedures (0.76%, n=115) and face procedures (0.53%, n=51). The introduction of the 5-Step Hematoma Prevention Protocol corresponded with a downward trend in hematoma rates, with a 68.8% decrease from 0.64% (n=166, 26,032 patients) during 1995-2017 to 0.2% (n=37, 18,101 patients) during 2017-2024 (p<0.0001). Procedure-specific trends showed a 49.4% reduction in hematoma rates for breast procedures (0.96% vs. 0.49%; p=0.0009) and a 91.03% reduction for face procedures (0.74% vs. 0.06%; p<0.0001). In abdominoplasties, where TXA was not administered in either cohort, hematoma rates showed only a modest decline of 6.7% (0.82% vs. 0.77%; p=0.8655).

Conclusion: This study represents the largest single-center analysis to date, encompassing 44,133 cases performed over three decades, with a focus on hematoma prevention strategies. We present a comprehensive 5-Step Hematoma Prevention Protocol that integrates evidence-based measures, significantly enhancing patient safety in outpatient plastic surgery.

Hematoma Rates

1995-2017

Hematoma rates

2017-2024

Rate Change (%)

p Value

All procedures

0.64%

0.20%

68.75%

p<0.0001*

Face procedures

0.74%

0.06%

91.03%

p<0.0001*

Breast procedures

0.96%

0.49%

49.39%

p=0.0009*

Abdominoplasties

0.82%

0.77%

6.71%

p=0.8655