A221
Remote Sensing of CH4 and CO2 from Space: The Expanding Observing System IV Posters

Wednesday, 16 December 2020: 04:00-20:59
Poster
Primary Convener:  Annmarie Eldering, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States
Conveners:  Christopher O'Dell, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States, Scot M Miller, Johns Hopkins University, Environmental Health and Engineering, Baltimore, MD, United States and Charles E Miller, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
Primary Liaison:  Annmarie Eldering, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
Chairs:  Annmarie Eldering, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States and Charles E Miller, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Scot M Miller, Johns Hopkins University, Environmental Health and Engineering, Baltimore, MD, United States
 
An Overview of the First Half of the OCO-3 Mission (682508)
Annmarie Eldering1, Christopher O'Dell2, Peter Somkuti3, Thomas Taylor1, Matthäus Kiel4, Robert R Nelson1, Gary D Spiers5, Brenden Fisher1, Ryan Pavlick6, Thomas P Kurosu5, Gregory B Osterman1, Joshua Laughner7, Robert Rosenberg5, Graziela R. Keller-Rodrigues8, Shanshan Yu9, Yuliya Marchetti1, David Crisp6 and Paul Wennberg4, (1)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (3)Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (4)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (5)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (6)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (7)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, (8)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States, (9)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
Exploring Geometry and Aerosol Effects of OCO Target and Small Area Map Measurements via Simulation Studies (774140)
Emily Bell1, Thomas Taylor2, Aronne J Merrelli3, Chris O'Dell4, Robert R Nelson2 and Annmarie Eldering5, (1)Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (2)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States, (4)Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (5)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
A new Fused L3 OCO-2/GOSAT product performs equally well in Data Assimilation as the pooled L2 products (673646)
Vineet Yadav1, Jonathan Hobbs2, Hai Nguyen2, Amy J Braverman1, Susan Sund Kulawik3, Junjie Liu4, Matthias Katzfuss5 and David Baker6, (1)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)Bay Area Environmental Research Institute/NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA, United States, (4)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (5)Texas A&M University, Statistics, College Station, TX, United States, (6)NOAA, Boulder, United States
 
A new research mode integrating carbon data and super-computing resources into big data e-science platforms (677852)
Jing Zhao1, Guo Qing Li2, Chong Lian Zhang2, Chun Zhen Huang3 and Yi Liu4, (1)Dr. of Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Earth Observation Data Center, Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Beijing, China, (2)National Earth Observation Data Center; Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, (3)Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, (4)Insititute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
 
Analysis of 3D Cloud Effects in OCO-2 XCO2 Retrievals (682795)
Steven T Massie, LASP, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, Heather Q Cronk, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, CO, United States, Aronne J Merrelli, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States, Sebastian Schmidt, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, CO, United States, Hong Chen, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States; University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, United States and David Baker, Colorado State University, CIRA, Fort Collins, United States
 
Characterizing OCO-2 XCO2 Variability Across Land-Ocean Boundaries in the Continental United States (698740)
Kayla Alexis Mitchell, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States, Scott Doney, University of Virginia, Department of Environmental Sciences, Charlottesville, VA, United States and Gretchen Keppel-Aleks, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
 
CO2 distribution around Mega-city Tokyo observed by GOSAT target mode operation (757268)
Ryoichi Imasu, University of Tokyo, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, Bunkyo-ku, Japan, Yutaka Arai, The University of Tokyo, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, Kashiwa, Ibaraki, Japan, Tsuneo Matsunaga, Natl Inst Environal Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, Masafumi Ohashi, Kagoshima University, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Kagoshima, Japan and Hiroaki Kondo, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan
 
Comparing GOSAT and OCO-2 Observations with High-resolution CO2 Simulation Driven by Fluxes Optimized with Surface Data Inversion (688940)
Shamil S Maksyutov, Yukio Yoshida and Tsuneo Matsunaga, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
 
Data sampling from the space and urban fossil-fuel CO2 emissions: do we measure often enough? (751829)
Ruixue Lei1, Sha Feng2, Dien Wu3, Chris O'Dell4, John C Lin3, Matthäus Kiel5, Annmarie Eldering6, Gregoire Broquet7, Alexandre Danjou7, Tomohiro Oda8 and Thomas Lauvaux7,9, (1)Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, University Park, PA, United States, (2)The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, University Park, PA, United States, (3)University of Utah, Atmospheric Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, (4)Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (5)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (6)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (7)LSCE Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Gif-Sur-Yvette Cedex, France, (8)Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, MD, United States, (9)Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, University Park, United States
 
Errors in Retrieved Gases and Inferred Fluxes Arising from Non-uniform Scene Illumination: A Case Study for the GeoCarb Mission (755206)
Sean Crowell1, Chris O'Dell2, Gregory McGarragh2, Jeffrey Nivitanont3, Peter Somkuti2, Denis O'Brien4, Eric Burgh5, David Crisp6 and Berrien Moore III3, (1)University of Oklahoma Norman Campus, Norman, OK, United States, (2)Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (3)University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States, (4)University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia, (5)Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center, Palo Alto, United States, (6)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
Evaluating consistencies between total columnCO2 measurements from OCO-2 and the in-situ network (762407)
Bharat Rastogi1, Michael Trudeau2, John B Miller3, Lei Hu4, Arlyn Andrews3, Marikate Ellis Mountain5, Thomas Nehrkorn6, Kaiyu Guan7 and Caroline B Alden8, (1)NOAA/ESRL, Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)NOAA, Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)NOAA/ESRL GMD, Boulder, CO, United States, (5)Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Lexington, MA, United States, (6)AER Inc, Lexington, MA, United States, (7)University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, Urbana, IL, United States, (8)Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
 
Evaluating the line-shape parameters of air- and self- broadened CO2 lines toward a sub-percent accuracy level in atmospheric retrievals (677163)
Robab Hashemi1, Iouli Gordon2, Ha Tran3, Roman V Kochanov4, Ekaterina Karlovets2, Yan Tan5, Julien Lamouroux6, Ngoc Hoa NGO7 and Laurence S Rothman8, (1)Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, United States, (2)Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, Cambridge, MA, United States, (3)Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, IPSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Ecole normale superieure,PSL Research University, Ecole Polytechnique, F-75005, Paris, France, (4)Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Quantum Mechanics of Molecules and Radiative Processes, Tomsk, Russia, (5)Hefei University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China, (6)Independent researcher, Paris, France, (7)Hanoi National University of Education,, Faculty of Physics, Cau Giay, Vietnam, (8)Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Atomic and Molecular Physics, Cambridge, MA, United States
 
Facilitating analysis of Satellite Derived Measurements of CO, CO2, and CH4 Using A Suite of GES DISC Services (715955)
Jennifer C Wei1, Thomas Hearty2, Andrey K Savtchenko3, Jennifer M. Adams1, Jian Zeng4 and TCCON, (1)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, GES DISC, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (2)Wyle Information Systems, Inc., Lanham, MD, United States, (3)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 610.2, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (4)NOAA College Park, College Park, MD, United States
 
Global surface CO2 flux estimates using GOSAT-2 observations (712799)
Makoto Saito1, Yosuke Niwa1, Tazu Saeki1, Kazutaka Murakami1, Tatsuya Miyauchi2, Hisashi Yashiro3, Tomohiro Shiraishi1, Ryuichi Hirata1, Yukio Yoshida4, Isamu Morino5, Hibiki Noda2, Hirofumi Ohyama1, Akihide Kamei1 and Tsuneo Matsunaga6, (1)National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, (2)NIES National Institute of Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, (3)NIES National Institute of Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, Japan, (4)NIES, Tsukuba, Japan, (5)Nat.Inst. for Environ. Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, (6)Natl Inst Environal Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
 
How well can TROPOMI satellite measurements constrain methane emissions? An OSSE study for North America using the GEOS-Chem adjoint model (708922)
Xueying Yu, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, Minneapolis, MN, United States, Dylan B Millet, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, St Paul, MN, United States and Daven K Henze, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
 
Impact of Baghjan Oil Well (Assam, India) Blowout and Leakage of Greenhouse Gases (752689)
Ramesh P Singh, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Mandi, India, Akshansha Chauhan, School of Basic Science and Research, Sharda University, Knowledge Park III, Greater Noida, India; Sharda University, Uttar Pradesh, India, Jing Feng, CEA, Beijing, China, Mahendran Maruthamuthu, Amnex Infotechnologies Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad, India, Shukla Acharjee, Dibrugarh University, Dibrugarh, India and Biswajit Nath, University of Chittagong, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Chittagong, Bangladesh
See more of: Atmospheric Sciences
<< Previous Session Proposal | Next Session Proposal >>