CAA Affiliated Societies and CAA Professional Committee – Sessions Soliciting Contributors


Bad Government: Art and Politics in the Eighteenth Century
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: American Society for 18th Century Studies
Amy E. Freund, Southern Methodist University


How did art, architecture, and visual and material culture in the long eighteenth century perpetuate or resist objectionable forms of government? This panel will consider how the arts were weaponized both by political leaders to shore up their regimes and by their critics to bring those regimes down. Potential topics include but are by no means limited to: the arts of the eighteenth century’s revolutions and counterrevolutions, the enlistment of the visual arts to justify, perpetuate, and resist colonialism, popular media and propaganda, the building and destruction of palaces, monuments, and other public-facing forms of art, artists as political actors, private and domestic forms of artistic control and contestation, portraits of rulers and political figures, sacred art in the service of secular struggles, and the mobilization of scientific illustration for political ends.


Blue Worlds and Italian Art
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Italian Art Society
Jillianne Laceste, Boston University


In today’s world, we live in an era of rising sea levels, coastal erosion, and the decline of marine biodiversity. Ecological anxieties have led to emerging scholarship examining humans’ cultural and social relationships with blue worlds. In Italy’s long history, seas and oceans have served as spaces for navigation, trade, and warfare. Smaller natural and manmade bodies were used as sites of ceremony, leisure, and human pleasure. Artistic engagements of water range, from ancient grottos to contemporary site-specific installations such as Christo and Jeanne-Claude’s Floating Piers on Lago d’Iseo. How has water served as subject matter, material, or artistic inspiration within Italian art? How do artworks embody aquatic beliefs, concerns, and attitudes? This panel invites presentations that explore the presence and significance of enclosed and flowing bodies of water in Italian art from antiquity to the present day.


Creating a Welcoming Classroom: Fostering Belonging
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Community College Professors of Art and Art History
Prof. Susan M. Altman, MFA, Middlesex College and Dr. Monica Anke Hahn, Community College of Philadelphia


How do we, as artists and art historians, create a sense of belonging in our classrooms? In a time where students are too often disengaged from the community, how can we foster belonging? A one-size-fits-all method of teaching is ineffective and faculty must develop innovative pedagogical strategies to help our students learn. How can we encourage our students to see the relevancy of our subject matter and feel connected to the material? How can we help our students have agency, center their voices, feel part of a community, and increase engagement in the classroom? This panel seeks innovative teaching strategies and projects that support all students and foster a sense of belonging in the classroom, the studio, and the learning community at large. We encourage all to share their approaches, but especially those from community colleges and other 2-year institutions.


Design Activism as Repetition, Reconstruction and Reinvention
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Design History Society
Harriet Atkinson, University of Brighton and Alex Todd


This panel examines the ways in which forms, methods and narratives recur in design activism. Design activism, defined here as the practice of using images, objects and type as tools in support of political action, is a distinctly referential process, through which historical citation can situate one struggle’s alignment, or misalignment, with another (Sholette, 2021; Huyssen, 2003). In this mediating role, design activism’s forms and methods move across temporal, spatial, and political boundaries and thus provide ideas, models, and symbols that energise new or existing political movements and activists (Atkinson, 2024; Maasri, 2015; Demos, 2013).

This panel addresses the adaptations, continuities, and slippages that occur in design activism across times, spaces, and cultures. How is the act of history-making politicised in these contexts, and how are its narratives represented? How are histories repeated, reconstructed, and reinvented to serve different political objectives? What methods can historians, archivists, and activists develop to facilitate the activation and reactivation of historical ideas for contemporary struggles, as well as those of the future? Papers may address, but are not limited to the following subject areas:

  • Histories of design activism as providing patterning for the present and inspiring hope for the future.
  • Craftivism as historically-informed political practice.
  • Archiving visual, craft, graphic and material cultures as radical practice.
  • Pedagogical tools and methods for teaching histories of design activism.
  • Case studies of design activism as tools for decolonising and queering histories.
  • Curatorial strategies for staging design activism.
  • Limitations and tensions in methodologies of histories of design activism.


Hot Glue not Hot Mess: Foundation Projects and Practices That Actually Work (and Why We Love Them)
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Foundations in Art: Theory and Education
Meredith Starr, Foundations In Art: Theory & Education


Let’s be real—teaching in Foundations can feel like a weird blend of art school boot camp, MacGyver-style problem solving, and deep pedagogical soul searching. This panel is a space for Foundation educators to show off their most inventive, risky, or unexpectedly brilliant classroom projects and practices—the ones that make students light up, fail gloriously, or totally surprise you (in the best way). We’re especially interested in projects that use non-traditional materials in innovative ways; reinvent the “foundations” of Foundations; reimagine feedback and assessment as a lifelong tool; bridge classroom learning with research, service, or community work; challenge students to think, make, and question in the age of AI; embrace process over perfection—messy, tactile, ambitious work that brings Foundations students together are welcome!


Obscene Beauty: Design’s Affair with Luxury
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Design Studies Forum
Victoria Rose Pass and Brockett Horne, Boston University


This panel will explore the relationships between decadence, excess, and monstrosity as manifested in designed objects. Through case studies in fashion, graphic, product design, and other areas, the panel will examine how design pushes the boundaries of impropriety. From bespoke commissions to small-scale coveted collections, quiet minimalism to lush and saturated visuals, design has been a means of manufacturing desire and constructing value beyond a product’s inherent offerings.

Design allows consumers to express the wildest aspirations of their own identity, a longing for the forbidden, unattainable, and extravagant. While modernist notions of “good design” have emphasized simplicity and ideas about cleanliness and purity, which have become coded as expensive, there have always been alternative modes of expressing exclusivity and expense. Designers and consumers have always resisted these restraints, expressing appetites for forms that boldly embrace excess. We welcome papers that analyze designed objects contemporary or historical in the context of race, gender, queer theory, ecocriticism, or other methods adjacent to design practice.

We are looking for papers that explore the aesthetics of luxury, from materials to textures, bold typography, or opulent color palettes. Papers might consider packaging for “vice products” such as alcohol and perfume that entangle refinement with impropriety, blurring the line between elegance and excess. Papers on Maximalism might explore how design weaponizes extravagance or embraces excess with over-the-top production techniques. Papers exploring limited edition collectibles might analyze how design signals exclusivity and scarcity through these designs. This panel welcomes papers that deal with luxury design broadly defined.



Rethinking the Artist’s Book in the Digital Age: AI, Authorship, and Authenticity
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: College Book Art Association
Levi Sherman, University of Wisconsin—Madison and Peter J. Tanner, University of Utah


Digital technologies, AI, and materiality have transformed how we create, consume, and understand art and information. In this digital age, the artist book remains a tactile, immersive medium, emphasizing the importance of haptic engagement. Positioned between tradition and innovation, artist books invite reflection on authenticity, authorship, and material presence.

This call invites submissions that engage with artist books, exploring themes like art history, literary critique, production methods, exhibition practices, and accessibility. We are particularly interested in work examining cultural, racial, and gender dynamics, as well as how AI and technology are reshaping materiality and the artist book.

We encourage contributions that explore any of the following topics and more:

  • Art Historical and Literary Analysis: How do artist books challenge traditional narratives?
  • Materiality and Production: What does the materiality of artist books signify in a digital age?
  • Theoretical Inquiries: What frameworks apply to contemporary book art?
  • Exhibition Practices and Access: How do exhibitions address the challenges of artist books?
  • Cultural, Racial, and Gender Dynamics: How do artist books engage with identity and power?
  • AI and Digital Technologies: How are AI and digital tech transforming artist books?

We invite scholars, artists, curators, and practitioners to submit papers exploring the intersections of visual, textual, and critical practices in the artist book. Submissions can cover methodologies such as art history, literary studies, critical theory, cultural studies, and digital humanities, with a focus on both historical and contemporary innovations in book art.



The Archival Art Historian
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: International Center of Medieval Art
Lauren Rozenberg, University of East Anglia and Dr. Millie Horton-Insch, Trinity College Dublin


Art historians of the medieval past are often required to conduct research within archives that were not designed for art historical research. The development of online databases are gradually revolutionising the study of medieval art, however, art historians of the medieval past must still frequently contend with generations of afterlives, layers of bureaucracy and confounding archival systems which rarely prioritise the visual. Working within these spaces presents both challenges and exciting opportunities for original interventions. This panel would invite papers that reflect on the experience of conducting art historical research in archives that were not designed with art historians in mind.

This session aims to foster a productive discussion about the intricacies of art historical research and the position of archives therein. The 90-minute session will consist of five 10-minute presentations, followed by a round table discussion and Q&A. Presentations will reflect on: a single archival encounter, object, institution or methodological problem and will raise issues that will form the basis of a generative broader conversation between panellists and with the audience. Possible topics may include: discussion of working with unillustrated catalogues, the challenges of studying material that is still ‘active’ in a religious context, or the complexities which surround the creation of digital archives. We hope the session will touch upon medieval archives and objects from across periods and geographies and we define ‘archive’ in the broadest possible terms, to include both digital and physical collections.



Transformative Studio Practices through Creative Meaning-making
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: National Art Education Association
Lynnette Gilbert, National Art Education Association and Yichien Cooper, National Art Education Association


The National Art Education Association (NAEA) strives to strengthen and promote the well-being and resilience of people and communities. NAEA emphasizes five core values: creativity, interconnectivity, inclusivity, ingenuity, responsibility. As educators, we draw insights from a wide range of tools and processes; we engage with historical and contemporary artists (Graham, 2023) while fostering engagement, observation and reflection through a range of creative processes at the intersection of materials and methods as artists/teachers/researchers.

In the meaning-making process, we spark self-awareness and interconnectivity (Lucero, 2023) through exploration and understanding of communities as it relates to schools, higher education institutions, museums, and community agencies. In this session, presenters from NAEA Higher Education Division will highlight how they engage in the core values of creativity, interconnectivity, and inclusivity at the intersection of studio practices, instruction, and research. This session aims to answer the following questions: (1) How does your pedagogical practice transform studio, instructional, and research practices that interweave historical and visual narratives of the people and place within communities of practice? (2) As artists, educators, and researchers, how do creativity, interconnectivity, inclusivity, ingenuity, responsibility amplify connections with a range of communities (schools, institutions of higher education, museums, community centers)?

References:

National Art Education Association (2022). NAEA core value. https://www.arteducators.org/about/core-values

Graham, M., & Goldsberry, C. (2023). Reimagining the Art Classroom. Intellect (UK).

Lucero, J. (2023). Conceptualist permissions for teacher posture. Center for visual art. Metropolitan State University of Denver.



We Are Living in a Digital World and This Is a Digital CR
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Catalogue Raisonné Scholars Association
Jackie Foster, Robert Rauschenberg Foundation and Marin R Sullivan


As workflows, research, and catalogue raisonné publications become increasingly digital, what does it mean to produce a truly digital CR? The CR is no longer a static, stable tome but rather a tool or resource, something to expand understanding, extend legacy, and spur new research and scholarship. With a digital publication, the benefits of searching, sorting, and filtering artworks, publications, and exhibitions are immediately apparent, as well as the ability to update records without issuing an addendum. Even if a CR is being published in print, it is almost certainly catalogued in a digital database. This session will examine how CR projects can harness the possibilities of digital, while minimizing the pitfalls. What opportunities exist for collaboration and information sharing across projects, while maintaining confidentiality as necessary? How might we employ data standards and controlled vocabularies to find connections across data sets while preserving nuance in an artist’s oeuvre? If an artwork entry can be updated at any time, why not publish as soon as the research is finished? Is it possible to share research in progress without confusing readers—how do we balance transparency and timeliness with clarity and accuracy? And with all of this in mind: is the purpose and function of catalogues raisonnés changing and if so, what comes next?


Word-image encounters: ethical dimensions of words for/about/through images
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: International Association of Word and Image Studies
Tilo Reifenstein, International Association of Word and Image Studies and Kyveli Lignou-Tsamantani, York St John University


The relation between images and words has been a focal point for scholars from many different disciplines. WTJ Mitchell’s semiotic approaches (1994; 2012) conceptualised this link via the 'imagetext' as synthesis, rather than 'image/text' as rupture. Clive Scott (1999) and Susan Sontag (2004) engaged with it through the written contexts of/next to images, and the impact of writing on one’s ability to comprehend a photograph of violence, respectively. In literary studies, recent scholarship counters the oft-antagonistic understanding of word-image relations. David Kennedy and Richard Meek (2018) proposed a more reciprocal model of ekphrasis that highlights exchanges and encounters. Liliane Louvel (2018) similarly moved away from assessments of dominance and emphasised the collaborative conjunction that produces a 'pictorial third' between reading and seeing. This panel will explore such debates through analyses of the ethics of images vis-à-vis writing.

Whether as seemingly innocuous captions, suggestive titles or full-blown art-historical/theoretical discourses, words next to/around/about/in the work frequently mediate, intensify or otherwise (co-)determine our encounter with images. This power, responsibility and opportunity to 'shape' images carries a significant ethical dimension. Topics may include, but are not limited to:

  • How do ethical understandings of the re-presentational nature of an artwork rely on written (con)texts?
  • How do viewers’ ethical perceptions shift when they become readers of written (con)texts?
  • How do we problematise the power dynamics of word-image ethics if the words are not the maker’s?
  • How do understandings of word-image relations as symbiotic, antagonistic or neither affect an analysis of ethics?


Beyond Piranesi: Urban Representations in Contemporary Printmaking
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Association of Print Scholars
Braden Scott, University of Manitoba , Helena Perez gallardo, Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Carlos Lozano Guillem


Giovanni Battista Piranesi (1720-1778) codified a modern style of representing the city by inaugurating dramatic perspectives, bird's-eye views, forced diagonals, and futuristic visions. For example, in his prints of Rome’s Campo Marzio and the Via Appia, Piranesi focuses on the sublime exaltation of ruin and antiquity, while revealing, as well, a discourse on architecture and the contemporary city. Piranesi’s style of printed images determined an aesthetic of later representations of modern architecture and urban spaces (Paris, London, Wien,...). Nineteenth-century romantics and twentieth-century avant-garde multimedia artists, such as Sergei Eisenstein, marked the next generation of engravers who represented the contemporary city. After Piranesi, printed depictions of the modern city pull together nostalgia, nightmare, history, the exaltation of progress, and ruins—marking the past with ideas, as well, of a future.

This panel highlights print media’s role in the representation of urban and architectural transformations in large cities. We invite papers that bring forth the work of printmakers, and also institutional or personal projects, that analyze aspects related to the artistic change that engaged with the representation of the city, new perspectives in the representation of urban morphology, documentary or propagandistic intentions, and also questions around media and the issues that allow print scholars to establish a broad intercontinental conversation of urban representation in modern and contemporary culture.



Beyond the Theory-Practice Divide: Interdisciplinary Approaches and Methods for Research and Scholarship in Art and Art History
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Committee on Research and Scholarship
Amanda Wasielewski, Uppsala Universitet and Brian Campbell, MFA, University of North Texas


Research in art and art history has traditionally been divided among professional roles—artist, historian, curator, critic, archivist, and others—often working within distinct institutional and methodological frameworks. Increasingly, however, researchers embrace interdisciplinary methodologies, drawing from multiple fields to shape their scholarship. This shift prompts us to consider the intellectual, institutional, and political conditions that enable or constrain such methodological expansion, and to reflect on how these evolving frameworks might reshape our understanding of disciplinary boundaries, expertise, and knowledge production. These integrative approaches often destabilize the traditional divisions between theory and practice, historical inquiry and creative production, and institutionalized research and experimental methodologies.

This panel seeks to explore how hybrid research practices foster methodologies for studying art and art history, broadening the scope of research and scholarship in the field. How do these innovative practices challenge conventional scholarship, reshaping the ways we produce, present, and circulate research? What innovative methodologies emerge when art research draws from interdisciplinary knowledge and hybrid professional roles? We invite papers that critically examine both the challenges and opportunities of interdisciplinary research, considering how expanded methodologies transform our understanding of art and its histories.

Perspectives and methods of interest include, but are not limited to: decolonial, feminist, trans and queer theory; disability studies; geographically situated and area studies; practice, studio-based and artistic knowledge production including curatorial practice; perspectives on hybrid professional roles in the field (e.g. artist-curator, scholar practitioner); digital humanities and quantitative approaches; critical knowledge organization; and interdisciplinary methods from the natural and social sciences.



Hybridity, Adaptability, and Exchange During the Long Eighteenth Century: Producing Global Aesthetics in Decorative Art and Design
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Historians of Eighteenth-Century Art and Architecture
Zifeng Zhao, University of Cambridge and Alisha Ma, London School of Economics and Political Science


Over the long eighteenth century (c.1689-1815), the decorative arts and design underwent profound change via global diffusion of objects, techniques, and knowledge. Although global artistic exchange has shaped cultural landscapes for centuries, this particular period saw the creation of new aesthetic paradigms and fostered cultural discourses regarding notions of cultural agency, identity, and authenticity. This session examines the making of global aesthetic traditions and practices in the long eighteenth century by closely interrogating the dynamics of cross-cultural hybridity, adaptability, and exchange along with their usefulness as art historical concepts. Furthermore, the session will illustrate how the evolution of artistic traditions shaped visual, material, sensorial, and political landscapes across the early modern world.

We invite contributions that address how individuals and collectives responded to cross-cultural interactions, creatively adapting and transforming these influences into novel, hybrid forms. We welcome papers from diverse geographies that consider how decorative art and design functioned as crucial contact zones where local traditions were continuously reimagined through exchange as well as resistance. For example, Indian artisans adapted traditional cotton textile designs for European tastes, while European potters such as the Delft and Meissen factories experimented with new technologies to produce ceramics in competition with Chinese porcelain. Meanwhile, Colonoware pottery was produced by enslaved Africans in North America from a combination of African traditions, local resources and practical demands. Ultimately, this discussion will deepen scholarly understanding of the role played by the decorative arts in producing global visual and material cultures during the long eighteenth century.



Let's Get Metaphysical: Rethinking the Empiricism of British Art
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Historians of British Art
Douglas R. Fordham, University of Virginia


Histories of British art rarely ask metaphysical questions. More common are narratives in which the empiricism of Locke and Newton inspired artists to draw and paint the material world “after the life”. But how feasible was it for British artists to bracket metaphysical questions out of their work? As Eugene Thacker noted, “‘Life’ is a troubling and contradictory concept.... Every ontology of ‘life’ thinks of life in terms of something-other-than-life [which] is most often a metaphysical concept, such as time and temporality, form and causality, or spirit and immanence.”

What, if anything, enabled British art to transcend its base materiality? Should paintings ever be more than mimetic ‘pictures’ of the material world, and if so, what beliefs, ideas, or eternal propositions did they invoke? We have grown accustomed to thinking of British artists as post-Reformation iconoclasts who embraced an empirical view of the world. Painting is treated like a mode of critique in which artists contributed to the disenchantment of the modern world. This panel is interested in British art, in any medium and from any period, that refused to settle for mimetic realism. While altarpieces, funerary monuments, and the spiritual visions of William Blake immediately come to mind, papers could interrogate the ‘naturalism’ or ‘lifelikeness’ of J.M.W. Turner, the Pre-Raphaelites, Walter Sickert, and a great deal more.



The Value of Play in the Creative Process
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Committee on Design
Andrea Lyn Hempstead, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi , Delana Gabbard, Southeast Missouri State University , Grace Hamilton, Baruch College, City University of New York , Mallory Kimmel, George Mason University and Ting Zhou, University of Connecticut


Play is often perceived as non-pragmatic, yet it is an essential driver of creativity across all design disciplines. This panel explores the transformative power of play in design thinking, problem-solving, and innovation. Faculty from diverse design fields will share insights into how play fosters experimentation, unlocks new perspectives, and encourages risk-taking in the creative process. We will examine how structured and unstructured play methodologies can be integrated into design education and professional practice to enhance ideation, collaboration, and user-centered outcomes. By embracing play as a strategic tool rather than an afterthought, educators can encourage failure as part of the process, as well as cultivate more adaptable, intuitive, and engaging student solutions. This discussion invites students, educators, and practitioners alike to reconsider the role of play in shaping the future of design.

This panel is seeking representatives from all design disciplines – including, but not limited to, architecture, graphic design, industrial design, textile design, fashion design, interior design, product design and interaction design – to contribute to this conversation.



Who's Afraid of Decorative Art?
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Association of Historians of 19th-Century Art
Adrienne L. Childs and Ivana Dizdar, Yale University


In the history of global nineteenth-century art, decorative is often treated like a pejorative term. Even as scholars increasingly resist boundaries between ‘fine art’ and visual culture, the decorative arts are largely neglected or expressly avoided. Why maintain the exclusion of decorative objects, whose production, circulation, and reception are inextricable from the history of art? The exclusion of decorative art stems from its supposed inferiority within the hierarchy of visual media; its frequent elusiveness with respect to attribution; and its entanglements with industry, consumerism, and domesticity. Perhaps most importantly, the exclusion appears rooted in assumptions that decorative art is apolitical. Yet decorative objects—from porcelain to wallpaper to clocks—were a function of the artistic, social, and political developments of the nineteenth century. We invite submissions that explore how decorative arts offer a critical lens into the period’s complex sociopolitical currents, including (but not limited to) imperialism, slavery, technology, extraction, commerce, and collecting. As markers of status, wealth, luxury, taste, and style, how did objects and images considered decorative contribute to the formation of personal and collective identities? What kinds of intersectional issues were embedded in decorative objects? How did these objects shape conceptions of what constituted modernity in—and beyond—the Euro-American context? How did the decorative not only reflect but also influence global geopolitics?


Art and Identity in a Post-Colonial Pacific
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Pacific Art Association
Anne Allen, Indiana University Southeast


In 1962, Western Samoa became the first Pacific Island nation to gain independence. In an increasingly globalized world, the country turned to artistic expressions that spoke to indigenous traditions while communicating a new identity as a modern nation-state. The Samoan experience was not unique; numerous Pacific cultures have grappled with balancing heritage and their new status in an increasingly capitalist world.

Thomas defines creativity in the context of contact as reactive objectification, “a fundamental cultural process that proceeded in pre-colonial indigenous societies, facilitating mutual differentiation, but was transformed after those societies’ contact with Europeans and underwent further development as the character of colonial encounters changed” (1992:214). These processes continued in the post-colonial environment. Papers for this session will address how individuals, families, communities, or governments in the indigenous Pacific utilize art and architecture to express identity in today’s world. Questions to be considered might include: What are the choices being made and their motivations? What is the role of hybridity? What are the interactions between the various stakeholders? How have contemporary Pacific artists responded to the challenges of personal and cultural identity in the islands or in the diaspora? How have communities at home and abroad asserted both heritage and contemporary distinctiveness? What roles have governments played on the national and international stages? How have indigenous artists residing in traditional homelands in which they are now a minority responded to the post-colonial environment?

Thomas, Nicholas, 1992. The Inversion of Tradition. American Ethnologist, vol. 10. no. 2: 213 – 232



OPEN SESSION FOR EMERGING SCHOLARS
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Association for Latin American Art
Victoria I Lyall and Madeline Turner


The aim of the ALAA-sponsored open session is to provide a platform at the annual conference to highlight work produced by advanced graduate students and recent Ph.D.s who concentrate on the histories of Latin American and Latinx arts and/or visual and material cultures. Papers may focus on any region, period, or theme related to the Latin American and Latinx experience, including pre-Hispanic/Ancient American art, colonial/viceregal art, the art of the long nineteenth century, modern art, and contemporary art, in any of its forms and expressive manifestations from what is today Latin America, the Caribbean, and the U.S. In reviewing submissions and selecting the papers for the session, the co-chairs will be looking for strong proposals that cover a range of subjects across each of the noted areas. Co-chairs encourage papers that address issues related to underrepresented genders, ethnic groups, and social classes.


Road Trip. The art and material culture of communal travel routes.
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Midwest Art History Society
Stephanie R. Miller, Midwest Art History Society


2026 marks the 100th anniversary of the establishment of Route 66 in Chicago, Illinois. The celebrated, historic 2,400-mile “Mother Road” connected Chicago to Santa Monica, California with countless stops along the way, from small roadside towns to large cities, through the Midwest and to the West Coast. With this 100-year milestone as its inspiration, this session explores the art and material culture of travel and tourism by considering the visual culture of and along the travel routes which bind and connect us. In the Route 66 instance, examples for reflection and discussion might include billboards, postcards, souvenirs, National Park photo-ops, and the distinctive travel oases whose architecture highlights local styles or tourist expectations of such styles. This is, of course, but one example. This session intends to reflect the chronological and geographical expansiveness of various kinds of travel (commerce, tourism, pilgrimage, migratory, refuge-seeking) and the visual culture it generated. Medieval pilgrimage routes, the caravan routes of the Silk Roads, or the Grand Tour, hint at the breadth of longstanding, communal travel routes. Related scholarship on art creation prompted by travel born of necessity, such as with the Great Migration, the Dust Bowl migration, or the current refugee crises, is also sought. This session aspires to interrogate the art, artifacts, and associated visual culture that developed alongside this diverse travel or responded to it and its travelers.

Proposals are not restricted to MAHS members and are welcome from all scholars.



The Materiality of Text in Histories of Nineteenth-Century Art
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: William Morris Society in the United States
Giovanna Guzzi-Rossetti, Anglia Ruskin University and Lulu Ao, Loughborough University


In recent years there has been a growing interest in the use of written text in visual art. This session investigates how artists explored the aesthetics of text in a wide range of media during the nineteenth century. It invites proposals for historical, material, technical, and theoretical analyses of text in the period.

Papers focusing on any geographical region are welcome. Possible topics include, but are not limited to: the use of text by William Morris and the Pre-Raphaelites in tapestries, stained glass, illuminated manuscripts, paintings, and/or frames; the impact of typeface design on the semantics of language and its relationship to illustrations; and the role of typography in artistic networks.

We invite contributions from art historians, artists, typographers, and other practitioners in the field. Interdisciplinary and collaborative proposals are encouraged. Proposals that explore new methodological approaches to the materiality of text are particularly welcome.

Note: Financial support may be available from the William Morris Society in the United States for a speaker without institutional funding. If you would like to be considered for funding, please notify the session chair when you submit your paper proposal.



Emerging Scholars Panel, Historians of German, Scandinavian and Central European Art
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Historians of German, Scandinavian, and Central European Art and Architecture
Sara Blaylock, University of Minnesota Duluth and Allison Morehead, Queen's University


The Historians of German, Scandinavian, and Central European Art announce an Emerging Scholars panel at the College Art Association annual conference in 2026. We invite abstract submissions from all scholars and arts professionals studying material within the purview of our organization and who are either currently enrolled in a graduate program, or who have completed their graduate degree within the past five years (2020-2025).

The session is broad in conception. We welcome proposals for papers addressing any topic in German, Scandinavian, or Central European art, architecture, design, media, or visual culture of any period; proposals for papers focusing on theory, criticism, or historiography are also welcome.

While those who submit are not expected to be current members of HGSCEA, we invite all to join at our student/emerging professionals rate. Members receive an invitation to our annual dinner held during the conference.

Format:

All contributors are expected to present in-person at the Chicago meeting in February 2026. Three to four 15-minute presentations will be followed by a round table discussion and Q&A.

Proposals must include:

  • a proposal title;
  • an abstract of 250 words;
  • and a one to two-page CV listing graduate and post-graduate work, which may include
    • works in progress (including dissertation or master’s thesis title);
    • publications;
    • presentations made while in graduate school and in the years since graduation,
    • grants, fellowships, and awards;
    • qualifying exam areas;
    • work history (including TAships, assistantships, and instructor of record teaching);
    • service history (to the discipline, to your university, and/or to your community).


Learning Through Discomfort
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Education Committee
Heather Horton, Queens College / Art Department and Karen Shelby, Baruch College, City University of New York


Part of learning is being uncomfortable and being uncomfortable is difficult. Nevertheless, examining long-held beliefs about the world and engaging with new perspectives is the pathway to intellectual growth. Students often must grapple with points of discomfort to develop the ability to reason and to articulate reasoned ideas. In art, design, and art history classrooms, this might mean engaging with difficult or controversial works of art. Or it might mean acknowledging the lack of a “correct answer” to embrace nuance, complexity, and ambiguity. At times, it might mean approaching a dense reading or actively joining a challenging class conversation. These moments of discomfort can be some of our most demanding and potentially rewarding in the classroom.

This panel invites papers from educators exploring strategies for “learning through discomfort.” How can we encourage students to tackle big, difficult ideas? How do we create classroom communities that cultivate a climate of open inquiry, where students participate in good faith and expect the same of their peers? How can we establish norms that guide educational spaces, allowing students to engage with art and their peers? Papers might address strategies for teaching difficult works of art, artists, or movements; methods to establish classroom communities; or ways of embracing collective, productive discomfort in the classroom.



The Islamic Material Text: Local Traditions and Intercultural Dialogue
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Bibliographical Society of America
Hiba Abid and Jeanne-Marie Musto, New York Public Library


The goal of this session is to explore textual artifacts that have originated or been adapted for use in one or more of the cultural traditions of Islam. The interplay between cultures, including relationships between different Islamic cultures or between Islamic and other cultures, will be a particular focus. Papers that address any period up to 1914 will be prioritized. A variety of media will be considered, including objects, architecture, manuscripts, and printed materials. Examples of possible topics include the use and reuse of items bearing epigraphy in any language; the reinterpretation of imagery from elsewhere to illustrate Islamic texts; the early European historiography of Islamic materials. While attending to the specificity of local traditions, the session will consider the significance of these textual artifacts in intercultural and historiographic perspective. The geographical definition of “Islamic” is open.


What Difference Does AI Make?
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Digital Art History Society
Elizabeth Mansfield


When caa.reviews added Digital Scholarship to its masthead as a distinct genre of art historical research in 2015, the publication invited new field editor Pamela Fletcher to introduce the history and range of the diverse practices known collectively as Digital Art History to its readers. Fletcher’s “Reflections on Digital Art History” remains a key work in the historiography of Digital Art History not only for its stock-taking of current research in the areas of spatial analysis, text analysis, and network analysis but for its prescient reference to AI-based technologies “still in their infancy.” In the decade since Fletcher’s “Reflections on Digital Art History” first appeared, computer vision (along with other machine-learning-based technologies like large language models) has assumed an outsized presence in art historical practice (whether deliberately invited to be part of that practice or not). This session explores the impact of computer vision and other machine-learning systems on Digital Art History, with the understanding that the term “Digital Art History” can refer to a constellation of diverse practices and/or to a cohesive field within the discipline of Art History. In what ways are AI-based technologies changing, enhancing, or even undermining the work of Digital Art History?


Design Incubation Colloquium 12.2: Recent Research in Communication Design
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Design Incubation
Cat Normoyle, East Carolina University , Camila Afanador-Llach, Florida Atlantic University , Heather Snyder Quinn, DePaul University and Design Incubation , Jessica Barness, Kent State University , Elizabeth DeLuna and Daniel J. Wong, Design Incubation


We invite unique proposals on topics relevant to communication design research. Submissions should include one or more of the following: case studies, contemporary practice, scholarly research, or design pedagogy. We welcome proposals on a variety of topics across the spectrum of visual communication design.

Submit an abstract of 300 words along with title, category (design research, design theory, design history, teaching, or service), keywords (5), citations, name and affiliation. Please use the Design Incubation abstract submission form found here:

https://designincubation.com/call-for-submissions/

Submissions are double-blind peer reviewed. Reviewers feedback will be returned.

Accepted presenters are required to create a short (6-minute) presentation video in advance of the session, which will be published online.



From the Pantry to the Studio: Uses of Food in Art and Conservation
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works
Rebecca Anne Rushfield and Francesca G. Bewer


People throughout the ages have used edible materials and associated inedible parts to make art and preserve it both in visible and tasty forms as well as in less apparent ways.Sugar, for instance, has been sculpted into centerpieces for wealthy European patrons’ tables and into “calaveras de azúcar” for Mexico’s Day of the Dead; used as a resist in etching by the likes of Picasso; and deployed by conservators in the treatment of waterlogged wooden artifacts. Egg yolks can serve as binder in tempera painting; their albumen whipped into glare for medieval illuminated manuscripts or coated on the photographic paper of albumen prints; their shells decorated for over 30,000 years or broken and collaged as “tesserae” into mosaics. Algae, fish, garlic, gums, potato, salts, soy and a pantry-full of other ingredients make appearances in artistic production and conservation in fascinating ways.

Artists and historians, conservators, scientists and researchers from allied fields have been exploring a smorgasbord of such materials across time, cultures, and mediums from different perspectives. We invite you to the table for a session in which we will consider the properties, histories, production, and myriad uses of food stuffs in art and art preservation. This may afford opportunities to reflect on the parallels between cooking and crafting; engage with social issues around food production, access, consumption, and sustainability; consider conservation issues arising from experimental uses of food in art; and possibly test (and taste?!) some recipes!



Precarity and Power: Museums Navigating Crisis and Control
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Museum Committee
Lauren McCardel, Ursinus College--Berman Museum of Art and Sara Woodbury, Barry Art Museum


Since the 2025 Presidential Inauguration, museums in the United States have experienced ongoing hostility from the federal government. There has been canceled funding from the National Endowment for the Humanities and other granting agencies, and demands for anti-DEI rhetoric in exhibitions and programming. Museums are navigating a precarious and rapidly shifting cultural landscape, impacting their daily operations and long-term missions. While museums have managed reduced budgets, conflicting objectives between staff and trustees, and other crises for decades, the current political climate questions the very self-determination of their core operations. Organizing on the institutional and community levels is critical to both addressing systemic inequities within museums and resisting federal hostility.

This session considers museum adaptability amid ongoing social, political, and economic crises. We invite papers addressing both recent events and more perpetual subjects, including but not limited to: implementing social justice in an anti-DEI climate; sharing institutional resources across museums and other educational and civic organizations as a means of countering diminished funding; the impact of funding and institutional stakeholders such as Boards of Trustees on mission statements, exhibitions, or educational programming; the ways in which academic museums and galleries can partner with campus faculty and students to address changing institutional policies and culture; and other topics. Given the ongoing development of federal actions, we welcome projects and initiatives that are incomplete or evolving. We also invite funding organizations to share their perspectives on adaptability and resilience in these uncertain times.



Art & Architecture vs. Environment: Failure, Redesign, and Innovation in the Early Modern Iberian World
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Society for Iberian Global Art
Rebecca Yuste, Columbia University and Amy Chang, Harvard University


The history of the early modern Iberian world is strewn with stories of architectural ambition and engineering innovation that seek to defy, overcome, or restructure extant environmental conditions. Land-reclaiming and flood-controlling projects represent a major thematic in this period, from Regi Lagni in Naples to the desagüe of Mexico City, as do seismic-responsive architectures such as the famous Earthquake Baroque in the Philippines and Guatemala, and as well as post-earthquake architectures in Sicily and Lisbon. Early modern architecture and engineering is often characterized by new boldness of ambition in responding to, attempting to overcome, or intending to change environmental conditions, it often yields cycles of loss, failure, and reiteration, until new technics are achieved.

This panel seeks to learn from stories of architectural and infrastructural failure, innovation, and redesign, especially as it relates to practices of colonialism, from across the Iberian world. We invite papers that seek to complicate the narrative of architectural domination on the land and landscape and search for cases that focus on moments of disjunction and defeat in the face of environmental factors, and the struggle to respond.

Papers may examine the consequences of incomplete knowledge of landscapes, ecologies, and materials, and the cases under consideration may be architectural works that were unfinished, hypothetical, never realized, or rebuilt after confronting natural disasters and misunderstandings of ground conditions. We also welcome papers on artworks representing knowledge of materials and environments; moments of disaster, engineering, and rebuilding; or changes in understandings of nature and environment.



Dissent Nearby: Diasporic & LGBTQ+ Resistance
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Society of Contemporary Art Historians
Dr. Jocelyn E. Marshall, University of South Florida


In frantically trying to gain Republican support to pass a funding bill, Donald Trump asserted on Truth Social “We have to remain UNITED – NO DISSENT...VERY IMPORTANT...” (8 March 2025). As artists and activists have demonstrated for years, solidarity building and modes of dissent, however, often go hand-in-hand. This panel subsequently spotlights entwined histories of U.S.-based immigrant and LGBTQ+ communities as part of ongoing efforts to address issues of xenophobia, racism, homophobia, and transphobia using an intersectional and transnational feminist lens. Throughout the last century, American immigration acts have routinely included language of “sexual deviation” and anti-HIV-positive rhetoric in impermissibility rubrics. While, today, we are seeing immigrants be deported to Guantanamo Bay alongside federally funded programs removing “T” and “Q” from materials using an LGBTQ+ acronym, the relationships between U.S. legislation, diasporic displacement, and gender and sexual identities are arguably under-discussed in tandem. By closing this gap, the panel fosters both timely critical conversations and steps toward solidarity building, collective organizing, and mutual aid. Together, panelists voice dissent inside and outside of gallery walls.

Papers from a range of professionals – historians, theorists, curators, artists, and community organizers – are invited to collaboratively investigate the intersections of diasporic and LGBTQ+ resistance. Topics may include, but are not limited to:

  • Anti-imperial queer feminist methodologies
  • Strategies for navigating tensions between arts activism and institutional strictures
  • Critical approaches to issues of displacement and/or archival erasure/exclusion in art history
  • Solidarity building and forms of mutual aid inside and outside of the university and museum


Navigating Uncertainty: Art Markets in Peripheral and Global South Regions
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: The International Art Market Studies Association
Marta Pérez Ibáñez and Adelaide Duarte


In an era marked by post-globalization dynamics, economic downturns, political instability, and heightened societal tensions, the art markets of peripheral regions and the Global South encounter profound challenges. Fragile infrastructures, diminished institutional support, and volatile local economies render these markets particularly vulnerable to external shocks. Nevertheless, these adversities have also catalyzed significant innovation, resilience, and the creation of alternative frameworks for artistic exchange and value production.

This panel invites scholars, curators, market professionals, and researchers to submit proposals that critically examine the dynamics shaping these contexts. Contributions are encouraged to explore how local actors are redefining strategies, forging new alliances, and proposing alternative notions of success, thereby contributing to a more inclusive and diversified global art ecosystem.

We particularly welcome submissions that:

  • Present case studies of regional or local market adaptations;
  • Analyze the impact of digitalization and online platforms;
  • Reflect on emerging forms of patronage, collecting, and institutional support;
  • Investigate artistic practices that engage with or resist economic and political crises;
  • Offer theoretical reflections on the redefinition of value, visibility, and success beyond traditional Western-centric frameworks.

By bringing together diverse perspectives, this session seeks to deepen understanding of the innovative responses developed in peripheral markets and to propose new models for a more equitable global art system.

Proposals deadline for submission: 2025, August 29



Picturing Women and Feminist Legacies
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Women's Caucus for Art
Rachel Epp Buller


Representation matters. Spurred on in large part by 20th-century movements and activism for civil rights and equal treatment, artists and historians have spent decades bringing to light often-obscured histories and telling the untold stories of individuals. Who is represented, and how, highlights the ways in which histories are written, unwritten, and rewritten, both long ago and still today. While histories are recorded in many and varied ways, the genre of portraiture plays a key role, and who is telling the story—or who is chosen or commissioned to tell the story—can be as important as who is being pictured.

This panel seeks presentations, both historical and contemporary, on how and why women have represented other women through portraiture and thus contributed to writing women’s histories in visual form. Papers might address an individual portrait or a series, trace a particular feminist legacy or situate portraiture within another social or political context, examine the artist-sitter relationship, analyze an exhibition of portraiture, or otherwise highlight how an aspect of portraiture contributes to writing a history about women picturing women.



Appalachian Diaspora: the Environmental, Material, and Folkloric Ties to a Southern (and extending) Mountain Range
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: SECAC
Tracy Stonestreet, University of Mary Washington and Ms. Clare van Loenen, PhD


Stretching from Alabama to Newfoundland, the Appalachian Mountain Range is a collection of ridges, broad valleys, and sloping plateaus that both nurture and isolate its communities. Within this landscape, there is a way of being that impacts a person’s engagement in the world - a lasting, ancestral pull of place. Artists and researchers who have been touched by it often produce work that is environmentally, materially, or narratively connected to this southern mountain range, or to the extraction that is now rooted in its hills and valleys. In the divisive circumstances of the current moment, a more inclusive vision of Appalachia is emerging, tied to its diasporic community that finds itself far away in urban centers or suburban towns. Beyond any sense of elegy, there is a commitment among this diaspora not only to a sense of place, but also to a working-class ethic of mutual aid and rich material culture that spans visual outlets.

This session explores how such geographically-tied references might be both a salve and a reminder of realities so critical to the identity of home — a home twisted in on itself but also expansively beautiful and narratively rich. What are the visual ties that bind us back to Appalachia? How might we use this enduring connection to assert a less oppositional relationship between the mountains and the cities, the devastation of rural industry and the consumption of urban life? Panelists may share topics or practices that speak to Appalachia, whether directly or in diasporic echoes.



Larger Than Life: Interrogating Monumentality in South Asian Art and Architecture
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: American Council for Southern Asian Art
Ross Bernhaut, University of Michigan and Sonali Dhingra


In recent years, monumentality has emerged as a protean theoretical lens with growing relevance across art history and related disciplines. What makes something monumental? Over-human scale, material durability, public visibility, and commemorative purpose are among the constellation of answers scholars have proposed. There is also something ineffable; as Louis Kahn put it, “a spiritual quality inherent in a structure which conveys the feeling of its eternity.”

Despite the profusion of monumental statues and structures erected throughout South Asia’s history—Ashoka’s pillars, Buddhist stupas, skyscraping temples, Shravanabelagola’s Gommateshwara, the Qutb Minar, Mughal mausolea, Brutalist buildings, and the Statue of Unity to name a few—the interpretive potential of monumentality remains underexplored. This panel probes the relationship between exaggerated dimensions of artworks and edifices, their intended functions, and their afterlives. What aesthetic, political, theological, technological, and financial considerations have motivated the establishment of colossal works? How have architects and artists manipulated scale to imbue their creations with new meanings? And how have notions of monumentality been articulated in textual sources prescribing or describing the height of buildings and images?


We contend that monumental constructions are larger than life not only in their proportions vis-à-vis the bodies of their makers and users, but equally in terms of the memorial, political, soteriological, or eschatological significance behind their sponsorship. We invite papers that examine the centrality of scale and monumentality in the conception, fabrication, and reception of South Asian art and architecture from any historical period.



Reality Waits To Be Determined: What art is crucial for the contemporary now and who has the guts to show it?
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: ARC Gallery
Stacey Lee Gee, ARC Gallery and Educational Foundation


The art world is at a crossroads and in the crosshairs at the same time. An ideal art world will not spontaneously form; rather, it will be found in the art that comes next and in what art is chosen to be displayed publicly.

Over the last year, forces of mainstream populism, institutional cowardice, anti-intellectualism, and politics around the globe have mounted an overt game of chicken with art organizations, institutions, and galleries—young and old. Rather than accept this doom spiral as the future reality, how can this time period be leveraged as an opportunity to fix the unignorable widening cracks in how the art world routinely operates?

Artists have not changed. Deep and responsive artwork is made with the same tenacity as it always has been, despite ever-mounting challenges to the artist. Artists remain resilient, but what places make an overt effort to seek out and show their work? What spaces prioritize support for this work in the face of constant external pressure?

This session aims to showcase histories that can guide us, artwork that leads the way, and the physical spaces that bridge the gap between rhetorical ideals and the day-to-day labor involved in showing groundbreaking art.



Teaching in Perilous Times
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Professional Practices Committee
Jeffrey Abt, Wayne State University , Susan Moore, Indiana University South Bend and Marice E. Rose, Fairfield University


For over forty years, culture wars have swept across the United States. At the outset, they primarily affected the grant programs of federal and then state agencies, and through them, individual creative and performing artists and the institutions that presented their work. Over time, the social, religious, and political interests of culture-war proponents widened to include a much broader range of entities, from libraries to public and private educational institutions serving students at all levels, from kindergarten to graduate school. Now, through the budgeting and regulation of education at all levels of American society—federal, state, and local—individual teachers are also being targeted. There are increasing instances of teachers being told to either avoid certain subjects and terminologies or affirm politically favored ones, often at the risk of being fired or subjected to other punitive measures. The reach and ambiguity of such regulations places academic administrators and teachers in peril as they strive to navigate “gray areas” while providing a rigorous, appropriate, and caring education for their students.

Colleagues have already been coping with these challenges as they spread and intensified across the country in recent years. This session calls for proposals from teachers and academic administrators who have first-hand experience working in censorious environments and are willing to share their insights about how best to proceed among such impediments. We envision brief presentations by a few speakers followed by a moderated, round-table discussion that concludes with ample time for audience questions and comments.



The Elephant in the Statuary Garden: Celebrating the 250th Birthday of the United States
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Public Art Dialogue
Amy B. Werbel, Fashion Institute of Technology and Karen D. Shelby


On January 29, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order appointing himself Chair of Task Force 250, which is responsible for organizing an “extraordinary celebration of the 250th Anniversary of American Independence.” The order specifies construction of a National Garden of American Heroes this year, and the National Endowment for the Humanities has since that time issued a call for proposals.

Organizers of this session seek papers which analyze the role public statuary has played in past analogous commemorations of nation-state formation in any time and/or geographic region. Alternatively, papers may propose ideal (or unideal) contributions to the stated goals of Task Force 250 in light of present opportunities, challenges, and audiences for public art.



Feminist, Queer, and Trans Art Activists in Action!
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: The Feminist Art Project
Joanna P. Gardner-Huggett, DePaul University and Connie Tell, The Feminist Art Project


Feminist, Queer, and Trans Art Activists in Action!

For nearly twenty years, the Feminist Art Project has supported intersectional and intergenerational conversations regarding feminist, queer and trans activist art practices. Understanding the rich history of these collective tactics remains instrumental for continued organizing against political oppression and providing essential services to female-identifying individuals. For instance, in the 1970s, the arpilleristas produced embroidered narratives denouncing Chile’s totalitarian regime, while in the 1980s the Greenham Commons Women’s Peace Camp demanded an end to nuclear proliferation. In the 1990s, Chicago’s Sister Serpents engaged in guerrilla sticker and poster campaigns calling out misogyny and sexual violence and the Dyke Action Machine focused on lesbian agitprop in New York City. In 1999, the Dutch organization Women on Waves was founded to provide reproductive health services in regions where it is not safe or available, and in 2001, LaGender Inc. was established to support the trans health of women of color in the metro Atlanta area. As the voices of feminist, queer, and trans artists, activists, and scholars are being silenced in this political moment globally, this session seeks presentations by artists and scholars examining current or historical examples of activist art practices that offer models of protest and mutual aid, especially work overlooked in current art historical scholarship.

This session will solicit contributors for the 2026 panel.



Photographic Sovereignty
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: The Photography Network
Dr. Jordan Reznick, PhD, Grinnell College


Tuscarora art historian Jolene Rickard introduced the concept of visual sovereignty in 2006, calling for critical engagement with Native art that accounts for the distinct political and legal status of Indigenous nations as sovereign peoples enduring centuries-long colonial occupation. Hulleah Tsinhnahjinnie (Diné/Seminole/Muscogee) likewise describes her practice of photographic sovereignty as inverting the camera's colonial power with Native storywork of resistance, resilience, and survival.

These ideas continue to gain significance, with curator Veronica Passalacqua recently describing Native photography as a sovereign space where artists rematriate the medium with visions that sustain Indigenous relations. Diné photographer Will Wilson proposes that such relational use of photography Indigenizes the camera in keeping with Native oral traditions for transmitting knowledge, art, and literature. Meanwhile, scholars such as Leanne Betasamosake Simpson and Glen Coulthard expand discourse on sovereignty by foregrounding practices of refusal and cultural resurgence rooted in Indigenous lifeways.

Thinking with these artists and scholars, this session invites papers that center photographic sovereignty as a culturally specific, land-based, and relationally grounded mode of image-making. We welcome work on how the medium sustains Native bonds to land, kinship, and futurity. We also invite proposals that place photographic sovereignty in dialogue with non-Indigenous visual practices of self-determination—particularly among diasporic or colonized communities with parallel commitments. What concepts—such as photographic refusal, more-than-human lensing, techno-kinship, photographic rematriation, and archival repatriation—help sharpen this discourse? Together, we seek to foreground photographic sovereignty as a vital analytic in photography studies and a critical site of decolonial practice.



Rising Tides: Netherlandish Engineering in a Threatening World
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Historians of Netherlandish Art
Stephanie Lebas Huber


The popular idiom “God created the world, but the Dutch created Holland” refers to the origin story of The Netherlands as a land reclaimed from the sea. Dikes, polders, pumps, and dunes have had a marked presence in the Low Countries since the Middle Ages, rendering them symbols of national pride in land- and cityscape paintings created the founding of the Dutch Republic.

This transhistorical panel will take into consideration the Netherlandish histories of land reclamation, water management, and more broadly environmental engineering as a way to accommodate for growing populations. While landscapists Salomon and Jacob van Ruisdael, Esaias van de Velde, Meindert Hobbema, Jan van Goyen, and Aelbert Cuyp come to mind, papers need not be strictly focused on artwork from the Golden Age or restricted to painting. Presenters may also look to examples that correspond with more recent, even twentieth-century (or later) projects, such as the Zuiderzee Works of 1919, echoed in the work of De Stijl painters. Especially welcome are papers considering land interventions in the former colonial territories, from canals in Indonesia to sluices in Suriname. Seeking to engage a holistic picture of this history as the Low Countries are to enter a new phase, the papers in this panel should resonate with contemporary questions on the ravages of climate change.



The Value of Art History
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Services to Historians of Visual Arts Committee
Jenna Ann Altomonte , Heidi Elizabeth Kraus, Hope College , Sabrina De Turk, University of Maine and Anne R. Norcross, Ferris State Univ Kendall College of Art & Design


In curricula and substance, art history engages with the studio arts, design, film, history, philosophy, and museum studies. Art history is crucial to building critical looking, thinking, and literacy skills; cultural and social empathy; and new and emerging ways to employ digital technologies. Yet, university programs have devalued, under-funded, collapsed, and marginalized art history departments or degrees in favor of programs that emphasize STEM and other market-driven programs. This session sponsored by the Services to Historians of the Visual Arts Committee asks for proposals that respond to, complicate, subvert, amplify, and/or negate any of the following questions:

  • In what ways does art history bridge gaps between disciplines rather than simply serve other disciplines?
  • How does art history contribute to the broader humanities, and why is its preservation essential in higher education?
  • What are the implications of diminishing/closing art history programs?
  • In what ways can art history adapt to demonstrate its relevance in a rapidly changing educational landscape?
  • What are the root causes of the devaluation of art history in higher education, and how can they be addressed?
  • How can advocates/activists for art history better communicate its value to decision-makers in higher education?
  • How might art history’s inherent interdisciplinarity and variety of scholarly approaches lend themselves to helping instructors better understand student learning, innovations in pedagogical practice, and the transformation of higher education?

We look forward to a diverse array of presentation formats and approaches, including but not limited to didactic performances, scholarly case studies, confessionals, PechaKucha, and interactive lectures.



Animal Americas
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Association of Historians of American Art
Kendra Greendeer, Weisman Art Museum, UMN , Jennifer J. Marshall and Anne Ronan, Virginia Polytechnic & State University School of Visual Arts


Nonhuman creatures—mammals, fish, insects, birds, reptiles, amphibians—are everywhere in the art of
the Americas. They appear as subjects of representation; their bodies are routinely used in art supplies;
and their lives and bodies are subject to endless human manipulation. Nonhuman animals are also makers;
they create, destroy, reshape and repurpose material things, and they continually contribute to expanded
aesthetic ecologies of sound, taste, touch, and smell. And nonhuman creatures—variously experienced as
relatives, companions, captives, collaborators and aggressors—also look back. If John Berger asked,
“Why Look at Animals?” a reciprocal question might go like this: what do animals see when they look at
our human-made visual and material world?


“Animal Americas” invites papers that consider at least one of the above roles played by animals play in
the art history of the Americas. Because nonhuman beings move through geographies and chronologies
that don’t neatly correspond to the maps and timelines of humans—much less to categories of national
identity or academic specialization—this panel offers an opportunity to challenge the Americanist
subfield’s original boundaries. Further, given its investment in animal posthumanisms, ecocriticism,
materiality, and nonoccular aesthetics, this session invites methodologies that facilitate conversations
across the allied fields of Asian American, Black diaspora and African American, Latin American, Latinx
and Chicanx, Native American, and U.S. histories of art and visual/material culture. Possible topics range
widely, and may include: hives, dams, dioramas, zoos, cartoons, kids’ books, birdsong, butchering,
cochineal, conservation, scrimshaw, featherwork, albumen prints, musk perfumes, or parlor aquariums.



Artists' Personal Libraries as Sites of Art Historical Inquiry
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Art Libraries Society of North America
Scott R. Davis, Amon Carter Museum of American Art


Artists' personal libraries are an important, yet underacknowledged, resource for art historical research. Often known through inventories, institutions have increasingly turned toward preserving such collections as sites of knowledge as in the cases of Donald Judd, Isamu Noguchi, Allan Sekula, Georgia O’Keeffe, Romare Bearden, and Auguste Rodin among others. With relatively few exceptions, such as the libraries of Robert Smithson and Marcel Duchamp, and the research of Ségolène Le Men, artists’ libraries are often overlooked or limited to mention within footnotes. This has occurred as the broader use of archival resources has flourished as an established and prominent practice. Yet, the books, magazines, and records owned by artists, along with the personal inscriptions and marginalia they may contain, provide unique insight and information not available elsewhere. Understood as invaluable resources for art historical inquiry, the personal libraries of artists offer opportunities to examine the creative practices, personal lives, and ideas that underpin artists' work. This session seeks to explore new and diverse forms of scholarship based upon the use of artists’ personal libraries.


Dreamers and Schemers: On Trans* and Queer Worldbuilding
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: The Queer Trans Caucus for Art
Lorenzo Triburgo, Oregon State University , Dr. Jennifer Sichel, University of Louisville and Jason Le


How do we make the worlds we want to inhabit? How can we imagine new worlds for expansive trans and queer ways of being? How do we build these worlds? This panel seeks presentations that take up questions of trans* and queer worldbuilding. We are interested in practices that range from visionary and speculative to practical and tactical. We seek presentations that celebrate successes, as well as those that reckon with failures and disappointment. Possible topics include: building alternative networks, modes of communication, and spaces of solidarity; tactical alliances; community building among trans* artists; strategies for subverting oppressive rules and norms; strategies for thriving in spite of it all; utopian imagining. We invite presentations from artists, scholars, curators, and critics–dreamers and schemers of all stripes. We welcome scholarly and critical reflections on past and current projects, as well as new and experimental artistic works.


IP Amid Chaos
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Committee on Intellectual Property
Katherine de Vos Devine, Implement Legal and Nate Harrison, Sch of the Museum of Fine Arts at Tufts Univ


As with so many things in this moment we, the Committee for Intellectual Property (CIP) and the CAA membership more generally, find ourselves wondering about the fate of seemingly stable ideas and institutions. What threats to intellectual property (IP) emerge in the face of challenges to academic and cultural organizations? How can IP law (as well as CAA’s CIP) respond to rapid developments in AI with respect to fair use? Can we take brash pronouncements about IP on social media as real portents for the future?

This roundtable discussion invites proposals for brief contributions considering IP in art and intellectual production amidst the current chaotic legal, political, and media climate. We welcome examinations of IP cases currently at the bar, feedback from researchers with funding withdrawn or in limbo, and other examples of fallout from this moment of political and technological change. We also welcome long views on whether concepts like “fair use” and “intellectual property” have ever been secure and examples of precedents for our current crises in art, law, academia, and beyond. Together, we aim to foster a critical, collective conversation about how we understand, defend, and possibly redefine IP in a time of unprecedented uncertainty.



Sovereignty and the Built Environment
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: National Committee for History of Art
Jesús Escobar, Northwestern University and Amy F. Ogata, University of Southern California


This session will be the second of a series at CAA leading up to the 37th CIHA World Congress planned to be held in Washington, DC in 2028 with the theme Sovereignty. The experience of sovereignty can be an individual’s claimed self-empowerment or a group's self-rule and rule over others as well. Sovereign power can be exploited to create states of exception and exclusion while the claiming of sovereignty can also be necessary to reclaiming power over self-representation, as demonstrated in Indigenous Studies. The central question for this year’s panel is to explore how sovereignty has been manifested in built form, from ancient times to the present. Despite their differences in scale, individual buildings, public spaces, and urban masterplans alike often evoke concepts of dominance, dispossession, private property, and other matters related to power and its legitimation. Such messages might be conveyed through axial planning, verticality, or the use of ornament and decoration. For this session, we seek papers that explore any aspect of the built environment, encompassing architecture, landscape, construction, and urbanism from any geographical region. Proposals may cover any historical period, although special consideration will be given to premodern topics.


“Collective Futures”
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: National Council of Art Administrators
Paige Williams, Endicott College and Brooke White, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign


The changing landscapes of both higher ed and the arts calls for innovative strategies to manage resources, education, and community involvement. Collective Futures asks leaders from different backgrounds to explore how collaboration will shape the future of the arts. We seek proposals on how collective practices can create inclusive and sustainable arts futures in higher ed and beyond. We seek strategies for managing shared cultural responsibilities through partnerships and community-driven initiatives. By working together, institutions can protect and grow cultural heritage, keeping it relevant and accessible for future generations.

We are looking forward to discussions exploring how collaboration can strengthen institutions and amplify diverse voices in shaping cultural narratives. By sharing innovative practices and lived experiences, we aim to inspire participants to embrace collaboration to build a more equitable and sustainable future for the arts.

This panel seeks proposals that interpret this theme of Collective Futures broadly. You may wish to share your thoughts about an idea or project, experience, approach, etc. We are available to assist and support in developing a topic should anyone wish to reach out.



Indigenous Art and the Gendered Violence of Extractivism
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Committee on Women in the Arts
Elizabeth S. Hawley, University of South Alabama


In the customs of many Indigenous communities across the Americas, women—a category marked by an expansiveness extending beyond a binary system—are associated with and draw power from a deeply rooted connection with the Earth. Because of this sacred relationship, colonial invaders’ violence against Indigenous lands via conquest, settlement, and development was—and is—inextricably tied to their brutal treatment of Native women. Today, legacies of this violence and brutality continue in the form of ongoing extractivist activities and their devastating environmental consequences as well as the disturbingly high rates of violence against Native women that studies have shown to be particularly concentrated in areas of extractive industries.

Emphasizing Indigenous connections to ancestral lands and protecting the Earth from harm are central components of most Indigenous worldviews, and Native feminisms further underscore the key roles played by women in these aspects of Indigenous epistemologies. As English, Ktunaxa, and Cree-Scottish Métis scholar Joyce Green asserts, “Indigenous feminism draws on core elements of Indigenous culture—in particular, the nearly universal connection to land, to territory, through relationships framed as a sacred responsibility” (Green, 2017, p. 4).

This session seeks studio art and art history projects that investigate relational intersections of Indigeneity, feminisms, and land in ways that counter the gendered violence of extractivism, historically and today.



"And Who is My Neighbor?": Refuge, Sanctuary, and Representation in Modern Art and Visual Culture
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Association of Scholars of Christianity in the History of Art
Ronald R. Bernier, Association of Scholars of Christianity in the History of Art (ASCHA) and Rachel Hostetter Smith


The parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37) remains one of the most enduring narratives in religious traditions, raising profound questions about community, responsibility, and the boundaries of moral obligation. In an era of heightened political tensions, worldwide immigration on an unprecedented scale, and shifting social landscapes, the question "And who is my neighbor?" resonates with urgent contemporary significance. This session seeks to explore how religious traditions have grappled with the concept of neighborliness, hospitality, and ethical otherness, particularly through the lens of modern and contemporary visual art.

We invite scholars, artists, critics, and curators to submit proposals examining artistic representations of neighborliness, inclusion, and exclusion in various religious and cultural traditions from the 20th century to the present. How have artists engaged with the themes of hospitality, belonging, and social responsibility? In what ways do contemporary artistic practices challenge, subvert, or reaffirm religious conceptions of community and care? How do religious iconographies and theological discourses shape contemporary responses to the ethical dilemmas of our time?

Possible topics may include, but are not limited to:

  • The role of religious art in shaping concepts of hospitality and neighborliness
  • Artistic responses to migration, displacement, and borders in religious contexts
  • Community-based and socially engaged artistic practices inspired by religious ethics
  • Intersections of race, gender, class, and sexual identity in religiously inflected artistic representations of the "neighbor"
  • Sacred spaces, public art, and the politics of accessibility
  • The impact of interfaith artistic collaborations on contemporary understandings of community


Rules of Engagement: Art, Institutions, and Cultural Exchange in a Changing World
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: International Committee
Mar Morosse, Baruch College , julia Elizabeth Neal, University of Michigan and Brian Bishop, Birmingham City University


This session explores how geopolitical transformations — cultural, economic, and institutional — shape art's production, circulation, and reception today. From artist studios to museum exhibitions, biennials, and art fairs, how are shifting international dynamics influencing artistic content, curatorial choices, and audience engagement?
Participants are invited to consider how cultural institutions of varying scales respond to evolving conditions —such as changes in funding, shifting public expectations, and debates around restitution and ethical stewardship. How do these factors impact collection strategies, programming, and institutional values? What innovative approaches are emerging to navigate this complex new landscape, maintain cultural exchange, and support artistic freedom?
We particularly welcome case studies and reflections that examine:
• Institutional strategies in response to cultural or political constraints,
• Restitution and ethical considerations in heritage stewardship;
• Creative responses by artists and curators to resource limitations or global tensions;
• Historical precedents that offer insight into resilience, adaptability, and critical engagement through art.
This session invites scholars, artists, curators, and museum professionals to share research, practices, and perspectives illuminating how art and its institutions operate and evolve within an increasingly interconnected yet fragmented world.


Disability-First: Museums & Exhibition Design for Disabled Audiences
Abstract Submissions Closed
Session will convene: On location
Affiliated Society or Committee Name: Committee on Diversity Practices
Amanda Cachia, Arizona State University and Charles Eppley, Arizona State University


This panels seeks to showcase exhibition case studies for how the global museum is embracing disability and diversity as a key part of its offerings, where disabled audiences are considered first and foremost as part of the museum’s overhaul in exhibition design strategies. Since COVID-19, museums have begun to demonstrate more leadership by inviting and inserting contemporary disability art into its programming, its collections, its policies and its hiring practices. While this is encouraging, the next necessary and timely step is to think about how disabled audiences can also be centered in the development and display of exhibitions, where access aesthetics and the voice of the contemporary disabled artist play a critical role in reshaping the aesthetic foundation that underpins the museum. Some of these strategies might include the implementation of crip institutional critique, access aesthetics, the plain language movement, technology including artificial intelligence, and architectural elements including lighting, ramps, benches and other furniture. This panel is excited to learn from curators, artists, art historians, educators and others who have experience to share in innovative display strategies and museum design that can be used as templates and tools for how the museum can moved forward as a space that challenges the image-centric culture of our arts and cultural spaces.